Quantcast
BANKTHINK

Community Banks Should Ask for a Divorce

DEC 20, 2011 8:14pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(4) Comments

Nothing lasts forever as evidenced by the short term marriage of Hollywood stars. Differences in attitudes, status and in some cases just irreconcilable differences often cause breakups following many years of being together. One of fraying relationship is the 100 year plus association between the 6,000 plus smaller community banks and the nation's largest banks. This long standing relationship between big and small is on the rocks as the two groups have drawn apart, rarely working together or supporting one another anymore.

Over recent years all banks have become subject to public loathing, increasing regulation, and required to maintain more capital some in the form of systemic capital as required of the larger banks by Dodd Frank and Basel III. All banks and their bosses are the targets of the Occupy Everything groups, accused of destroying the values and opportunities of the bottom 99% of America while many banking executives receive incomes some consider larger than life.

Unfortunately the community banks of this country are thrown under the bus by just being a bank. They have been unable to disassociate themselves from extra costs and lost credibility resulting from the scared reputation of the bigger banks. Today the community banks are subject to the same increased regulatory burden, increasing capital and general public disdain as the larger bank.

For years the big banks and community banks coexisted in friendly competition serving different market segments with similar products. Today the big bank's principal focus is on larger customers and markets and low-cost technically based products and services many of which are now offered in competition to the community banks. In addition big banks historically helped and serviced the small banks clearing and funding needs, offered capital support, loan participations and even lavishly entertained the small bank officials at banking conventions. They wanted to provide accommodative profitable support services to their lesser brethren who would willingly serve the smaller customer of the local community.

It's difficult to leave a long relationship, but the two groups have little in common anymore competing for customers and offering little cooperative support. At the same time the community banks bear the common reputation and regulatory burden of the larger banks and that has become costly and an impediment to their success.

It's time for community banks to differentiate themselves from the big banks in the eyes of the public, the legislatures and the regulatory community. They must seek regulation under a different set of expectations, consistent with their size, capabilities and the ability to compete consistent with community opportunities.

An organized campaign of community banks should begin to disassociate community banks from the large banks and most specifically any accountability for the 2008 financial crisis. The public, Congress and the administration as well as the press should be the target of that effort and in gaining a clearer understanding of the necessary role of community banks. The ability to have community banks able to raise local capital and function to advance the needs of the local consumers and small businesses is essential to many local communities and the overall economy.

It must be understood that local community bankers aren’t getting personally rich but are working to serve and often become leaders of the local community. It must be recognized that community banks don’t and can't have the resources to meet the plethora of regulatory and legislative requirements which are common to those required of the larger banks.

Presently the community banks are diminishing in number because they can no longer effectively compete with the larger banks unless they have achieved a scale of nearly a billion dollars in assets. Many communities can't support that size of a local bank or can't offer enough capital to support the banks existence. As a result few new banks are being formed and many once successful local banks are being merged into bigger entities or the customers forfeited to the larger banks local branch.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(4) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Kumbaya Moment for Banks, CUs; Brown-Vitter as WMD: Week's Best Quotes
The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (4)
There is no question that community banks need to seperate themselves from the large banks and it needs to be done now, 2012 is a good place to start!

DC Manditch, Chair. & CEO
Empire National Bank
Posted by dmanditch | Friday, December 23 2011 at 3:16PM ET
I'd invite you all to the credit union charter, but our regulator is probably no improvement over what you have. Many in our ranks are looking to the bank charter to expand services and growth. One is reminded of the porridge that Goldilocks found: The mega bank one is too hot and the credit union variety is too cold. Perhaps we would be stronger together and better able to find a regulator that serves both our needs. Besides, continued fighting has served no one, wasted precious resources best spent elsewhere, and we are both weaker for the experience.
Posted by GDStockdale | Friday, December 23 2011 at 4:02PM ET
BOB YOU ARE RIGHT ON THE CENTRAL ISSUE WHICH I, AND I HAVE TO ASSUME, MANY OTHER COMMUNITY BANKERS ARE CONTINUALLY STRUGGLING WITH; SEPARATING OURSELVES FROM THESE LARGE BANKS. THIS IS REALLY A GENUS VS. SPECIES ARGUMENT. WE MAY BE FROM THE SAME GENUS BUT WE ARE ENTIRELY DISTINCT SPECIES AND WHAT WORKS FOR THE BIG BANKS HAS LITTLE IF ANY APPLICABILITY TO US. WITH BASEL, WE MAKE PESTO, OUR HEDGES WE TRIM WEEKLY AND OUR DERIVATIVES, I'M TOM INSTEAD OF THOMAS. THAT MESSAGE NEEDS TO BE DELIVERED TO DC. AND YOU PHRASE IT EXTREMELY WELL! HAPPY HOLIDAYS
Posted by Tmcgraw | Friday, December 23 2011 at 5:10PM ET
It is so true and so obvious! What does a community bank have in common with a "TBTF" financial institution?

While I agree that there should be a "public" awareness of the differences, I think it is more important from a "political and regulatory perspective".

Politicians are mostly owned by the large financial institutions; they do not know any better; and it will be hard to win them over.

Regulators are bureacrats and have a conflict of interest in that they want to preserve their jobs. The more complicated, the better for them.

It should be a "no brainer" for 100% of community banks to join forces and exert the necessary pressure.

I say, have each community bank contribute $10,000 a year to a PAC and use the money to finance the campaigns of any person running for office that will agree with our point of view and work in Congress to change the way all banks are lumped together for regulatory purposes. $60 million a year will go far.

I wish you the best of luck.


Jorge H Coloma
Posted by jhcoloma | Tuesday, December 27 2011 at 2:00PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.