Quantcast
BANKTHINK
FEEDBACK

Greed, Not Government, Led Housing Market to Ruin

AUG 23, 2012 10:57am ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(12) Comments

Kevin Villani's attack ("Yes, Subprime Crisis Was Government's Fault," Aug. 22) on the Community Reinvestment Act and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's affordable housing goals is the latest in a long line of fact-free "analyses" that has all the trappings of a conspiracy theory, including the most relevant: it's not true.    

Villani rehashes a convoluted meta-narrative developed in recent years in which "U.S. housing policy" caused the subprime crisis, with CRA and the affordable housing goals as "enablers."  This myth has been debunked by Republican appointees to bank regulatory agencies, the bipartisan Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Federal Reserve economists, and bank CEOs.  The most plausible explanation for the crisis is the simplest: unbelievable levels of greed and stupidity throughout the financial marketplace, including by GSE executives.  
 
CRA lending had, in fact, a minimal role in the housing boom.  The boom in loans that drove the foreclosure crisis occurred from 2001-2006, a period in which CRA's influence was at an all-time low. During the subprime boom, only 6% of all higher-priced mortgages were made by banks operating in their CRA assessment areas, according to the Federal Reserve.  The sad reality is that an unregulated shadow financial system pushed explosive subprime loans.        
The goals were distorted by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for their own ends. Multiple federal reports have disclosed how the GSEs manipulated their affordable housing goals to maximize their profits. Fannie Mae executives bragged about writing "the housing goals…in such a way that they had no teeth," according to the 2010 book All the Devils Are Here.  
In addition, the Washington Post reported in a 2008 article that HUD, the companies' goals regulator in the early 2000s, allowed the GSEs to count triple-A securities backed by higher-cost subprime and alt-A loans as meeting their "affordable housing" goals.
 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gamed their "affordable housing" mandate brilliantly.  I had to laugh when I read Villani's contention that "politically anointed CEOs were installed who were more inclined to meet housing goals." No one involved in housing issues in Washington over the past 20 years thinks that Congress made the GSEs do anything.
 
These are the facts. Villani's account is simply counterfactual, an unfortunate trend in our nation's discourse these days.
   
Judy Kennedy is the President and CEO of the National Association of Affordable Housing Lenders.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(12) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Kumbaya Moment for Banks, CUs; Brown-Vitter as WMD: Week's Best Quotes
The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (12)
Judy is either in denial or spewing her groups talking points. She must have missed what she herself putin her commentary, "...HUD, the companies' goals regulator in the early 2000s, allowed the GSEs to count triple-A securities backed by higher-cost subprime and alt-A loans as meeting their "affordable housing" goals."

Kevin Villani had no attack on CRA. He was very simply stating the history of how the Federal Government through regulation (such as identified above) FORCED the lending community to make loans they historically would not make.

Yes, the Federal Government instructed Wall Street to get creative in opening doors to the underserved (poor credit & no money). Once the rating agencies were told by Federal Government to provide twisted ratings to the creative fundings, the Federal Regulators threatened banks with vioaltion of ECOA as these loans for the underserved were now rated worthy of bank's reguated risk managment.

Kevin Villani had the courage to stand up to cover-up by the Federal Government for their push through regulators that created the Housing & Financial Crisis.
Posted by NoSpin | Friday, August 24 2012 at 9:17AM ET
The root cause of the problem was the bankers' belief that that no matter what risks they took they would be bailed out when things went wrong. All the rest of the factors are just window dressing.
Posted by Carl Pruitt | Friday, August 24 2012 at 10:17AM ET
Then way did this not occur in the 1950's 1960's 1970's 1980's 1990's?
Posted by NoSpin | Friday, August 24 2012 at 11:21AM ET
I've never said there was no greed, that's not new. But the banks got stuck with most of the losses. Greed alone doesn't explain that.
Posted by kvillani | Friday, August 24 2012 at 12:23PM ET
Mr. Vallani: Can you provide a single example of a bank that got a "Needs To Improve" or "Substantial Noncompliance" CRA rating because they refused to provide subprime mortgages?
Posted by bartharness | Friday, August 24 2012 at 2:09PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.