BANKTHINK

Mr. Weill, Your ICBA Membership Card Is Ready

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

Sandy Weill, the poster child of too big to fail as the architect of Citigroup, suddenly sounds like a community banker.

For years, executives at many of the nation's 7,000 community banks have railed against their big brethren. They have complained about the excess risk and leverage at the largest banks, bemoaned federal bailouts and urged regulators to block big mergers like Capital One's deal to buy ING Direct. Weill now agrees with them, though his motivation is less clear than theirs.

"What we should probably do is go and split up investment banking from banking, have banks be deposit takers, have banks make commercial loans and real estate loans, have banks do something that's not going to risk the taxpayer dollars, that's not too big to fail," Weill said on CNBC's "Squawk Box" this morning.

I have heard these arguments, in sum or in part, from virtually every community banker I have met in the past few years. Take Dick Evans, the chairman and CEO of the $21 billion-asset Cullen/Frost Bankers in San Antonio.

The largest banks are "too big to manage and too big to regulate," Evans told the San Antonio Express-News in early April. He said he wanted to see the "risky behavior" of big banks separated from their balance sheet activity. "We shouldn't be putting risks on the public," he added.

Weill has apparently decided to join hands with Evans and other small bankers, which is downright unbelievable given the time and money that Citi spent in the late 1990s pushing for the federal reforms necessary to protect its merger with Travelers.

"I'm suggesting that they be broken up," Weill said on the program. Again, that is a call that you hear regularly from small banks and the associations that represent them. The same can be said for his comments that leverage should be "something reasonable."

The comment that threw me the most came when Weill asserted that "there should be no such thing" as off-balance-sheet transactions.

The Sandy Weill speaking today might make a great community banker, though I would surmise that most CEOs of small banks have every right to ponder his motives. Is he reshaping a legacy? Settling old scores? Is he trying to curry favor with politicians for some other purpose?

Regardless of the rationale, there are dozens of community banks in search of experienced directors and managers. Maybe Weill should apply for one of those jobs. It would certainly lend some credence to his words.

COMMENT: What do you think? Is Weill being sincere by calling for a break up of big banks? Or is there an underlying agenda to his words and timing?

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

Winners, Losers and Draws in Race for Deposits
Deposit surged despite all the challenges in banking, according to the FDIC's latest Summary of Deposits. However, underneath that upbeat number are a lot banks and thrifts that are suffering and a few that are capitalizing on the chaos. Here is a slideshow with the highlights and lowlights.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (1)
It's ironic that Sandy Weill, the insurance company magnate who jumped the gun with City to open the door for the adoption of Gramm-Leach-Bliley to permit the mixture of insured banking with other financial entities, would now be calling for the separation of commercial and investment banking.
Posted by bobmuth | Thursday, July 26 2012 at 9:53AM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.