Quantcast
BANKTHINK
Partner Insights

The Bank that Couldn't See the Forest for the Trees

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

A most interesting credit, encountered during the examination of the international department of a major bank, that was in the process of charge off, made the pages of the American press in the 1960s.

The bank I was examining had only a minor participation of $5 million in a multimillion credit shared by numerous banks coast-to-coast to finance the importation of vegetable oil from Europe.

The senior vice president and manager of the department said that, when the loan was made, it was so well-structured that it appeared "gold-gilded."

However, the importer was readily selling vegetable oil at a price lower than cost, and replacing it, in the tanks, with water covered by a layer of vegetable oil. It was a massive fraud.

Apparently, the lead banks' analysts did not analyze the credit, nor did the auditors perform audits in-depth, (no pun intended) which might have uncovered the fraud early on.

The most amazing fact about this credit came up when talking to an officer of another department of the bank.

The officer recounted how, while playing golf with a man, he asked what business the man was in. "Vegetable oil," was the answer.

The banker pressed on, and the golfer replied that, when he saw the importer selling at less than cost, he thought that something was wrong. It did not make sense, and he did not want to do business with the importer.

Top bankers, analysts and auditors all had lost sight of the proverbial forest for the tree. As simple as all that!

The credit might have been "gold-gilded," but it did not make sense, the first test that a credit must pass.

Over his 50-year career in banking, Ugo Nardi worked his way up from a teller to an auditor, lending officer, state bank examiner, and a bank president. He retired in 2000.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

Eight Reasons Deals Get Done – Beyond Price

OmniAmerican (OABC) had a good problem earlier this year: competing offers from eager buyers. The Texas bank, which "accepted a slightly smaller price" from Southside Bancshares (SBSI), explained its reasoning in a regulatory filing. Here are the highlights.

(Image: Thinkstock)

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.