BANKTHINK

The Real Problem with Reverse Mortgages? Lack of Competition

Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (2)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

As a mortgage industry consultant who still originates residential loans, one of my many concerns as we approach the five–year mark with the housing crisis is our collective memory has begun to fade on its causes. Additionally, we have yet to have a serious discussion as a nation on our housing policy. Worse, we have individuals who are in leadership positions offering a variety of poor advice, which can lead to more competition-killing regulation.

In a recent American Banker article, "Time to Reverse Course on Reverse Mortgages", Clifford Rossi laments over taxpayers backstopping residential mortgages, specifically reverse mortgages. I could not agree with him more that the government needs to reduce its involvement in mortgage financing. Unfortunately, for my children, this great country is backstopping everything from alpacas to wind farms. Today, more than 90% of all residential loans are backed in some way by the U.S. government. 

However, Rossi's finger-pointing at mortgage brokers, correspondent lenders and nonbank entities regarding lending and loan quality is misguided.  They didn't cause the current housing mess, nor will they be the cause of the next.

As a former correspondent lender, 100% of my loans were subjected to quality control reviews before closing compared to 10% to 20% at a retail bank. Furthermore, any loan written by a nonbank entity must comply with the same underwriting criteria as those written by a retail bank. Today, your third-party originator who is employed by a non-federally supervised institution is better qualified and held to a higher professional standard than their counterpart at a retail bank. Why? Third-party originators are required to be licensed and have to go through pre-license education, pass a state and federal exam and go through annual continued education. Dodd-Frank exempted the federally supervised institutions from these basic requirements and Congress should close this loophole.

Additionally, today's Federal Housing Administration-insured reverse mortgage should not be compared with exotic mortgage products of years past.  Borrowers must attend a rigorous mandatory counseling session prior to application and I encourage my clients to include family members and financial professionals in the decision process.

The FHA-insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, commonly known as a reverse mortgage, offers homeowners 62 years and older the ability to access the equity in their homes without credit or income qualification. In 2009, the program was expanded to permit home purchases.

Reverse mortgages are expensive loans for consumers. Prior to 2009, consumers had the opportunity to choose between the FHA-insured and private-label reverse mortgage loans, including a jumbo reverse mortgage product. However, since the collapse and onslaught of new lending regulations, the private reverse mortgage market has virtually disappeared, leaving the FHA-insured reverse mortgage as the predominant product in the marketplace. With its losses mounting in recent years, attributed to low-down-payment lending, the FHA has been forced to raise its mortgage insurance premiums multiple times in recent years. 

What this niche, but growing market needs is more non-government-backed lending.  Competition will drive down costs for consumers.   In order to accomplish this, the regulatory environment for originating and servicing must become more investor-friendly or they will continue to sit on the sidelines. 

One of the major concerns with servicing reverse mortgages is tax and insurance defaults and it usually occurs when the reverse mortgage is exhausted. The servicer is forced to outlay the funds to the municipality and insurance company to protect their collateral. I suspect this is why there was an exit by the large national lenders from the reverse mortgage business. Can you imagine what a public relations nightmare it would be for a Wells Fargo, MetLife or Bank of America to initiate foreclosure on Grandma and Grandpa over nonpayment of their property taxes?  The FHA is currently addressing this issue to allow for escrows.

Today, baby boomers are entering retirement with outstanding mortgage loans fueling the demand for this product. They are a wonderful financial tool and enable homeowners to remain in their homes and live with dignity.  Lenders who do not offer reverse mortgages are missing out on an opportunity to interface with their aging customers. We need to encourage private lenders to return to the market. Until that occurs, the FHA will need to fill the gap.

Richard Booth is a certified mortgage banker and industry consultant in Park City, Utah.  He can be reached at richard@richardboothcmb.com.

 

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(2) Comments

SEE MORE IN

2014 Predictions Revisited: What the Seers Got Right and Wrong

A year ago we asked BankThink contributors to make bold predictions about how the financial industry would evolve in 2014. Here's a look back at their forecasts and the actual outcomes.

Comments (2)
The real problem with Reverse Mortgages is the lack of any suitability standard and protections for the consumer. These are complex financial instruments with lifelong consequences that should not be sold without professional, competent financial and legal advice. If suitability was the determination to sell this product there would not be 60 to 70,000 in default for non-payment of taxes and insurance which by the way is only one of 17 triggers to default. And the FHA insurance fund would not be 2.8 billion dollars in the red while asking congress for a billion dollar bailout. I work with consumers everyday who are at risk of losing their property, quality of life and becoming dependent on social service programs at the end of life. Sandy Jolley, Reverse Mortgage Suitability and Abuse Expert
Posted by sjolley2 | Tuesday, July 09 2013 at 10:55PM ET
I suppose that the real problem of reverse mortgages is that the lenders do not protect consumers and do not provide borrowers with pieces of advice on how to pay off debt in a short period of time or how to avoid debt fake collectors or so. I live in Alberta Province and I know exactly that Canadians try to cope with the costs to the end of the month living from paycheck to paycheck. We all do not want to be abused by banks but times to times we meet this problem. As a result we get huge debts and do not know what to do. This is the main problem.
Posted by LuiseBr | Tuesday, July 16 2013 at 8:26AM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.