Quantcast

Dodd-Frank Reform Watch
Sponsored by

Clearing House Association Proves Dodd-Frank Works: Rehm

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+
Partner Insights

"Although the industry's track record when it comes to Dodd-Frank implementation is hardly noteworthy, its war-game to test regulators' new powers to seize and dismantle a megabank is not only fascinating, it's exemplary," writes American Banker's Editor-at-Large Barbara Rehm.

The Clearing House Association took on the undertaking of simulating a large bank failure. After 10 months and spending $2 million, the 18 largest banks that comprise the trade group were able to provide an example of the industry proactively participating in Dodd-Frank's implementation.

"Had this not gone well, it would have complicated the debate immensely," said Paul Saltzman, the president of the Clearing House Association.

During the simulation, which was divided into four phases, it was assumed that the Dodd-Frank Act was already implemented. The reform law prohibits regulators from bailing out any individual bank. This means that the simulated failed bank could not turn to the Federal Reserve Board for financial help.

Under Dodd-Frank, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation would have to confirm that a bank's failure could create a crisis across the entire financial system.

The Clearing House Association is still compiling the final report. Once completed, the trade group plans to share the report with regulators across the U.S.

For the full piece see "The Inside Story of How the Clearing House Proved Dodd-Frank Works" (may require subscription).

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

'I Want a Tom O'Brien Action Figure Doll': Comments of the Week

American Banker readers share their views on the most pressing banking topics of the week. Comments are excerpted from reader response sections of AmericanBanker.com articles and from our social media platforms.

(Image: Bloomberg News)

Comments (1)
And the first to nationalize the banking industry wins. And the very idea that a bureaucrat picks winners and losers is equally appaling. And the lack of free market disiciplines (no moral hazards; playing with monopoly money) changes the game considerably.
Posted by FreemenFreemarkets | Saturday, December 22 2012 at 10:58PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

About

As Dodd-Frank's impact continues to be felt far beyond banks' compliance departments, American Banker is your eyes and ears. In addition to our award-winning coverage, we now also scour a range of resources to aggregate even more of the news you need on this vital topic.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.