Quantcast

Warren, Dems Push Back Against GOP Narrative on Overregulation

SEP 5, 2012 11:24pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(5) Comments

CHARLOTTE, N.C. – The Democrats shrewdly paired their argument in favor of Wall Street reform Wednesday with a message that President Obama has delivered results for U.S. small businesses.

For each speech about lauding the president for reining in the big banks, the Democratic National Convention delivered another set of remarks about his administration cutting taxes and red tape for small businesses. At key moments, the two messages were delivered back to back.

The effect was designed to blunt the Republicans charge – seemingly repeated on a loop last week in Tampa – that Obama is choking the economy through overregulation.

The speaker called to deliver the week's most high-profile defense of the Dodd-Frank Act was Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, who came up with the idea for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. She cast the fight over Dodd-Frank in David vs. Goliath terms.

"I had an idea for a consumer financial protection agency to stop the rip-offs," she said. "You know, the big banks sure didn't like it, and they marshaled one of the biggest lobbying forces on earth to destroy the agency before it ever saw the light of day."

"American families didn't have an army of lobbyists on our side. What we had was a president – President Obama leading the way. And when the lobbyists were closing in for the kill, Barack Obama squared his shoulders, planted his feet, and stood firm. And that's how we won."

Elsewhere in her speech, Warren delivered her trademark brand of populist indignation with a dash of sympathy for small business owners.

"Wall Street CEOs – the same ones who wrecked our economy and destroyed millions of jobs – still strut around Congress, no shame, demanding favors, and acting like we should thank them. Does anyone here have a problem with that?" Warren asked, drawing big applause.

"I do, too. I talk to small business owners all across Massachusetts. And not one of them – not one – made big bucks from the risky Wall Street bets that brought down our economy."

Warren's message about regulating Wall Street was softened by her warm-up act, Costco co-founder Jim Sinegal, who sought to undermine the Romney campaign's claim that Obama doesn't understand the private sector.

"Some of my friends in corporate America say that they need a government that gets off the backs of businesses, and that's why many of them are supporting the opposition, with donations of hundreds of thousands of dollars," Sinegal said. "But I think they've got it all wrong. Business needs a president who has covered businesses' backs. A president who understands what the private sector needs to succeed."

Earlier, California Attorney General Kamala Harris also made a forceful case for why regulation is necessary, focusing on the financial sphere.

"I've seen all that happens when you roll back those rules," Harris said. "What happens are rows of foreclosure signs. What happens are mountains of family debt. What happens is a middle class that's hurting. That's what we've seen in towns across California and across this country."

Harris, who rose to national prominence for driving a hard bargain with the big banks in the multi-billion-dollar mortgage servicing settlement, accused Republican Mitt Romney of seeking to roll back financial regulation.

"Loose regulations and lax enforcement – that's not leadership. That's abandoning our middle class," she said.

But the context for Harris' remarks came in the two speeches that preceded hers. Both of those speeches subtly confronted the GOP argument that new rules for financial institutions are ultimately hurting small business.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(5) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Kumbaya Moment for Banks, CUs; Brown-Vitter as WMD: Week's Best Quotes
The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (5)
Neither republicans nor democrats understand the reality that, when you allow banks to hold much less capital when lending to what is perceived as "not-risky", like AAA and "infallible" sovereigns, than what they need to hold when lending to the "risky", like small businesses or entrepreneurs, you are effectively discriminating against the latter who, as a consequence, will have to pay higher interest rates than what they would have paid without these regulations.

http://subprimeregulations.blogspot.com/2012/07/complaint-i-presented-to-consumer.html
Posted by Per Kurowski | Thursday, September 06 2012 at 6:31AM ET
Wish her common-sense on fair business practices didn't come with so much baggage on other topics. Even so, her grade-school-teacher persona makes her a positive addition to a scene where any adult supervision has been missing.
Posted by HarrisonH | Thursday, September 06 2012 at 7:36AM ET
We seem to have a short memory in this country especially what the economic world was like when President Obama took office. Credit was frozen, the entire economy was on the verge of collapse and while you can argue why, big banks making speculative bets in securities they didn't understand while the regulators just rubber-stamped safety and soundness exams was a big part of the problem. The CFPB's settlement with Capital One shows the kinds of practices consumers have been dealing with for decades. Only an independent agency free of big bank lobbying efforts with Congress can reform those abuses and give the middle class a fighting chance. Banks' reluctance to lend to small business and to make mortgage loans has a very political tone to it.
Posted by randyh44 | Thursday, September 06 2012 at 9:40AM ET
The CFPB will (it has already begun) have the unintended consequences that always occur when those making the rules have very little real world knowledge or practical experience within the very industry they attemp to regulate. Everything Elizabeth Warren and those academics and policy wonks point to are the sins of the Big Banks. The problem is that in the end the Community Banks across this country - the very life blood for small business capital get hammered with all this new regulation in the great crusade to regulate the few big bad banks. The end result is that it will be harder and more expensive for entrepeneurs to hire more staff and to invent that next great thing. As a Community Banker I find myself frequently in the position of having to set very rigid credit standards with very little wiggle room on making exceptions as Compliance and regulatory risk could punish my shareholders. Ironically, the movement to regulate these big bad banks is bringing crushing cost to the Community Banks and is the catalyst to a massive consolidation.
All of this begs the question - Are the Elizabeth Warrens of this world really interested in helping the consumer or is the real goal to have a Canadian system with very few banks that can be run from Washington? Either way - American ingenuity is at risk without capital!
Posted by Watchdog1 | Thursday, September 06 2012 at 5:31PM ET
Then what should we do? Should the entire Banking world be painted with a broad brush due to the actions of the big six institutions? Or would it be more proactive to get to involved to shape legislation by illustrating and defendingthe best practices of Community Banks. To attack someone as foreign, or who has know real world operating experience does not move the pedulum our way one iota. Who was more knowledgeable than the masters of the universe that ran Washington Mutual. Unfortunately our industry is a small margin business that tends to fall in the monkey see monkey do paradigm that get's us all in trouble. We can'y walk lock step with the Large Banks, who have superior capital; then realize it is a bad deal for the smaller "bread and butter" insitutions. Community Banks are too vital an economic engine for families, small businesses and entrepenuers to not protect it's own interest.
Posted by smrice | Friday, September 07 2012 at 5:23PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.