Quantcast

JPMorgan Loss Highlights Need for Financial Reform, Geithner Says

MAY 15, 2012 10:35am ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(1) Comment

WASHINGTON — Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said Tuesday that the $2 billion trading loss at JPMorgan Chase makes a "powerful case" for the financial reforms being implemented under the Dodd-Frank Act.

Speaking at the Peterson Foundation's Fiscal Summit in Washington, Geithner said the JPMorgan loss was one of four serious tests of the financial system since the crisis, including the financial shock from Europe, the collapse of MF Global and the debt limit showdown and subsequent credit rating downgrade.

"This points out how important it is that the reforms are strong enough and effective enough that they can meet that key test," Geithner said, "not to protect shareholders from losses … but to make sure that when those mistakes happen - and they're inevitable - that they're modest enough in size and that the system as a whole can handle them."

"And we're going to make sure that we meet that basic test."

Geithner said he has not spoken with Jamie Dimon since the JPMorgan chief executive revealed the loss last week, which Geithner dubbed a "risk management failure." But he said regulators "are going to take a very careful look at this and make sure we understand what this means" for the broader set of reforms, including the Volcker Rule, capital and liquidity requirements, leverage limits and new derivatives rules.

"The test of reform is not whether you can prevent banks from making mistakes," he said. "The test of reform should be, 'Do those mistakes put at risk the broader economy, the financial system or the taxpayers?'"

The best way to prevent that from happening is to force banks to hold more capital, to bring down leverage and to make sure the rest of the system has better cushions against these kinds of mistakes, Geithner said.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

How to Bank the Underbanked: In Pictures

Bankers, nonprofit executives and others recently gathered to discuss how best to provide financial services to low-income and other underserved customers. Here is some of their advice about how to charge for prepaid cards and other products, how to create new ones and how to cope with increased regulatory scrutiny. (Image: Shutterstock)

Comments (1)
The continuing references to Chases's multi-billion loss as coming from the bank's risk-management hedging activities points to one of the most dangerous and insidious dangers of the To-Big-To-Behave banks. Namely their total capture of federal financial regulatory agencies who are willing to accept such utter nonsense without question. There's an old securities trader's maxim that advises against becoming the market. Conversely, risk management investments are usually characterized by high liquidity. As best I understand it, Chase's losses came from violating both of these concepts. As a result, it is unlikely the investments were hedges, and therefore would have been precluded by the Volker Rule. And, it is unlikely that these investments can be unwound without causing further losses and embarrassment to the bank.
Posted by jim_wells | Tuesday, May 15 2012 at 1:23PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

This feature displays payments industry news and analysis from American Banker sibling brand PaymentsSource. Registration is required; for more information contact customer service.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.