Quantcast

SEC Invites Whistleblower Claims in JPM Mortgage Settlement

FEB 11, 2013 1:50pm ET

Individuals who blew the whistle on a mortgage fraud scheme that ended up costing JPMorgan Chase (JPM) $296 million in fines have about three months to prove that their information helped lead to the settlement with federal regulators.

JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay the fines to resolve allegations that it and Bear Stearns, which it acquired in 2008, misled investors about the quality of mortgage-backed securities they sold during the run-up to the financial crisis.

Whoever can show they provided information that enabled the Securities and Exchange Commission to extract a pledge by the nation's biggest bank has until May 9 to document how he or she helped regulators enforce laws that led to the settlement, the SEC said Friday.

The settlement stems from a lawsuit the SEC filed in U.S. District Court in Washington in November that charged JPMorgan Chase with misleading investors about loans that provided collateral for a December 2006 offering of residential mortgage-backed securities. The suit alleged the bank knew that 7% of the loans that backed the securities were delinquent by between 30 and 59 days and in some instances longer but only told investors that 0.04% of the loans had such infirmities. Investors lost at least $37 million as a result of the allegedly undisclosed delinquencies while JPMorgan Chase received fees of roughly $2.7 million in underwriting fees.

The SEC further charged Bear Stearns with failing to tell investors in 156 residential mortgage-backed securities transactions over a roughly two-year period beginning in 2005 that the firm had kept most of the proceeds from buybacks by originators of loans that suffered defaults or had other defects. According to the SEC, Bear Stearns collected roughly $137.8 million from originators without paying anything to investors who had purchased the securities.

The lawsuit was based on information from at least one unnamed person who provided information about the alleged violations of securities laws by the companies. Under the agency's whistleblower program, which was created by Congress as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, eligible whistleblowers can claim between 10% and 30% of penalties collected by the regulators.

 

As part of the settlement, JPMorgan Chase agreed to pay $222.4 million to settle the bulk sales charges and $74.5 million to settle claims in connection with the delinquency disclosures.

By law the SEC, which must review the merits of any claims, can increase or lower an award based on the agency's review of a whistleblower's claim to proceeds. Funds that remain unclaimed by whistleblowers become the property of the government.

An SEC spokeswoman declined to comment on the case, which the agency coordinated with a joint federal-state task force that was formed last year by the Justice Department to probe misconduct in the mortgage market. A JPMorgan Chase spokesman did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

The company still faces varied claims stemming from its underwriting and sale of mortgage-backed securities on the eve of the financial crisis. In October, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman sued the bank charging that Bear Stearns abandoned its credit guidelines for reviewing borrowers whose loans backed securities it sold to investors over a roughly five years starting in 2003.

JPMorgan Chase also is one of 17 banks that have been sued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency for allegedly misleading Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in connection with the sale of mortgage-backed securities.

Comments (3)
What about the Ponzi scheme being conducted over at Ginnie Mae? Ginnie Mae cannot provide proof of a single purchase of the 800,000 or so foreclosures it ordered that the mortgage servicers illegally carried out.

Best example of the Fraud is look at the Washington Mutual Bank government insured loans Wells Fargo Bank has had illegally assigned to them and illegally administratively foreclose.

Wells Fargo not got a single piece of evidence that they purchase the loans, because they don't.

So what we have from the phony HAMP was 800,000 loans illegally foreclosed and $8 billion in False Claim submission to the Federal Insurances. Plus there is $16 billion in treble damages!
Posted by charleswreed | Tuesday, February 12 2013 at 11:21AM ET
The risk/reward ratio for whistleblowers is great. It's not for everyone, but if you want to learn how to blow the whistle from a veteran whistleblower, check out my blog: http://thoughtforyourpenny.blogspot.com/2012/06/anonymous-project-mayhem-tips.html
Posted by Versability | Tuesday, February 12 2013 at 4:59PM ET
I think I'll apply for the reward since the SEC didn't even know what the Bear Stearns double dipping scheme was until I first exposed it in my report for The Atlantic circa Jan 2011. I remember how they called the PBWT lawyers quoted in my story that afternoon. Which I reported also at RT's Keiser Report.
Posted by Teri Buhl | Friday, February 15 2013 at 3:44PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.