Quantcast

Foreclosure Protesters Disrupt Wells CEO's Speech

MAR 14, 2013 12:34pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(5) Comments

CARLSBAD, Calif. — A group of about 50 to 60 protestors interrupted a speech by Wells Fargo (WFC) Chief Executive Officer John Stumpf on Thursday at a banking conference, taking over the stage with chants and complaints about home foreclosures.

The protestors were affiliated with the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, a group that in the past few months has accused Wells of failing to offer principal reductions to delinquent borrowers, as required under the national mortgage settlement.

Stumpf was about 25 minutes into a speech about the state of the banking industry and increased regulation when a woman walked onto stage and held out her hand, which Stumpf shook. The woman then grabbed a microphone, raised her voice and told the audience "Wells Fargo is taking my house tomorrow."

The protestor later identified herself to American Banker as Betty Badro, a Glendale, Calif. homeowner and state worker who has been delinquent on her mortgage for at least two years.

Following Badro's appearance on stage, she was joined by several other protestors. Stumpf was escorted off the stage by a security detail and left the conference.

"While we respect the right of individuals to express their opinions, we are very disappointed in the actions protesters took at the Retail Banking Conference today that disrupted John Stumpf's presentation and the entire conference," Oscar Suris, an executive vice president of corporate communications, said. "This type of behavior damages efforts for productive dialogue and opportunities to work together to reach solutions."

The annual conference was taking place at a hotel in Carlsbad, California and is hosted by American Banker.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(5) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Seven Stories in Regulation and Reform You Shouldn’t Miss

Editor-at-Large Barbara A. Rehm broke an exclusive story last week detailing the results of the OCC's private tests of the 19 largest banks on corporate governance. The results are shocking. (Image: Thinkstock)

Comments (5)
"While we respect the right of individuals to express their opinions, we are very disappointed in the actions protesters took at the Retail Banking Conference today that disrupted John Stumpf's presentation and the entire conference," Oscar Suris, an executive vice president of corporate communications, said. "This type of behavior damages efforts for productive dialogue and opportunities to work together to reach solutions."

You have to be kidding me!!! I am glad she took a stand. I personally tried to contact my mortgage lender before they foreclosed on my home co-jointly owned with my ex-husband. He abandoned the home and I wanted it back. My calls were not returned, I was told they were too busy to handle my account and was given a run around for two months until they processed the foreclosure, resold the house in 5 weeks for a $ 60K profit. If I had the opportunity as this lady, I would have done the same thing! For these mortgage companies,it's business, for us homeowners it's personal. Take the time to address us as people and work with us. I was ready to pay the arrears but the bank wouldn't even return my telephone calls or emails. I say storm every conference until your voice is heard. I am personally tired of the banks discounting us who have paid up until the meltdown and who want to remain in our homes and recoup our investment. My investment has been resold twice and foreclosed at least once since the bank took action in 2010. I'd like to know how the corporate communications officer would feel if it was him in our shoes.
Posted by Shecommands | Thursday, March 14 2013 at 6:17PM ET
At this moment, there are roughly 4.2 million people interested in buying Ms. Betty Badro a nice, tall cold drink for her act of courage. The agenda for the conference did not include anything about branding issues associated with violating the public trust and profiting from the failure of many. It is on the agenda now. I doubt Mr. Stumpf will so easily brush aside the issue after today's close encounter with dirty reality. He, along with others in his position, can either disgorge the equity and make it right, or choose to spend the rest of their lives in a very posh prison of their own making. As they say, it's your move ...
Posted by teknoscribe | Thursday, March 14 2013 at 6:44PM ET
The Lady in the first comment said she had the money to pay the arrearage. If that is the case why didn't she just pay it? Then she woudn't have lost her home. Until just about everyone suffered from "irrational exuberance" between 2004 and 2008, the country's mortgage finance system worked quite well. We ( Congress, Banks, Borrowers) all pushed the limits of reasonableness until we reached a tipping point and then prices dropped. Did any Lender ever guarantee that property values would not go down? NO. I'm sorry she couldn't pay her mortgage. But there is nothing in the standard mortgage contract about modifying the terms, much less forgiving some of the debt. The terms of repayment are in the note and security agreement. And if you don't pay, the Lender's remedy, per the agreement every Borrower signs, is to foreclose. That's it. So, who's move is it? The guy who can't pay. A deal is a deal.....Isn't it? If not, then is any contract sacred?
Posted by justthefacts | Thursday, March 14 2013 at 7:10PM ET
4.2 million people did not suffer from a bout of "irrational exuberance" and move into McMansions they couldn't afford. A significant number of sub-prime loans were made, and those loans did help to distort the market and inflate some values over the short term. Far more people made normal, conservative deals for homes in their range that were modestly priced. When the reckless acts of institutional gamblers went south, the larger number of cautious people lost their jobs (we lose) and put their modest homes on the market at prices near those of the failed McMansions (we lose). After paying off the socialized risk with their tax dollars (we lose again), the private gains of the gamblers started to come back. Just what kind of deal are we talking about? The one where you pay $90k on a $144k loan over 6.5 years and get a theoretical $10k in equity that you can't collect? One where the bank "short sells" the property for $120k, adds it to the $90k for a tidy $65k in profit? That what we're looking for? Tell me: where can I sign up for another one of *those* deals. Shall we review some Annual Reports and see where the money went? Oh yes, let's play that game.
Posted by teknoscribe | Thursday, March 14 2013 at 11:16PM ET
A good way to bring attention to an issue won't you say? Granted the lady hadn't paid mortgage in 2 years but she may have been ignored if she had cried out for help at the start of her ordeal as most people are.
Posted by enforcer | Friday, March 15 2013 at 2:33AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.