Quantcast
"We think [tiered overdrafts] will be a way to compete with payday lenders, largely for people who want to avoid overdrafts," Greg Schreacke says. Customers "just assume we cover their checks, so they don't have to worry about it."

Small Banks Developing Ways to Compete Against Payday Lenders

MAR 27, 2013 9:33am ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(4) Comments

More community banks are preparing to fight payday lenders and technology upstarts for a bigger share of short-term, small-dollar loans.

For smaller institutions such One PacificCoast Bank in Oakland, Calif., and National Bank & Trust of Sycamore in Illinois, the battle isn't about booking loans. Rather, the goal is to win back fee income that community banks have ceded to others in recent years.

During the fourth quarter, service charges at banks with less than $20 billion in assets fell 3% from a year earlier, to $1.96 billion, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

Payday lending is a factor, says Brad Brown, senior vice president of retail banking at National Bank & Trust. He found out how pervasive payday loans were among his customers after the $592 million-asset bank bought a software program to assess its overdraft fees.

"There were so many [automated] debits coming through for payments on payday loans," Brown says. "I wasn't aware of the volume of our clients using" payday lenders.

National Bank is looking into offering individual clients credit lines for up to $1,000. It is also planning a tiered overdraft system, where only a small number of customers pay higher fees.

Tiered overdraft could add $80,000 to $120,000 in annual revenue at National Bank, Brown says. "We think it will be a way to compete with payday lenders, largely for people who want to avoid overdrafts," he says.

First Financial Service (FFKY) in Elizabethtown, Ky., also charges a variable overdraft fee, based on how often a customer bounces a check. The system offered a way to enter the short-term liquidity market, because many of First Financial's clients were already using overdrafts, says Greg Schreacke, the $1 billion-asset company's president. "They just assume we cover their checks, so they don't have to worry about it," he says.

One PacificCoast also has an alternative to paycheck advances. The $282 million-asset bank offers a service to employers that lets workers take out small-dollar loans. Executives at the bank could not be reached for comment.

Payday lenders, for their part, wonder why it took community banks so long to realize the need to go on the offensive.

"The traditional banking market hasn't worked for the middle class, but there's an absolute need" for these products, says Amy Cantu, a spokeswoman for the Community Financial Services Association of America, the trade association for payday lenders.

There are potential pitfalls for banks that raise their overdraft fees. Consumers have filed lawsuits against scores of banks over the issue. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency hit Woodforest National Bank in The Woodlands, Texas, with a $33 million penalty in 2010 for unfair and deceptive practices in the $3.7 billion-asset bank's overdraft program.

Legislative concerns also exist. Earlier this month, House Democrats introduced the Overdraft Protection Act, which would codify a 2010 Federal Reserve Board rule requiring consumers to "opt in" for overdraft protection. It would also cap the number of fees banks can charge an individual for overdrafts and prohibit ordering debit charges from "high to low," among other things.

Still, small banks are ignoring demand for short-term liquidity services at their own risk, says Robert Giltner, a consultant at Velocity Solutions who advises banks on retail products. Bigger banks like Fifth Third (FITB) and Regions Financial (RF), along with credit unions and other nonbanks, are developing small-dollar loan products, he says.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(4) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Kumbaya Moment for Banks, CUs; Brown-Vitter as WMD: Week's Best Quotes
The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (4)
Lemme see if I understand this. "the battle isn't about booking loans. Rather, the goal is to win back fee income that community banks have ceded to others in recent years." So, One PacificCoast Bank and National Bank & Trust aren't so much interested in lending to their depositors in need of credit (as might be required by the Community Reinvestment Act); they just want to make money off their depositors. Yipes!!! I hope this business concept exists only at these 2 misguided banks.
Posted by jim_wells | Wednesday, March 27 2013 at 8:22PM ET
Mr. Wells is correct. These banks exhibit small time thinking and are missing the big picture. They have a wonderful opportunity to capture the upper middle income class (while also serving the lower income customers that need the short-term small dollar loans discussed above)from the major predatory banks like Wells Fargo, US Bank, Regions, Fifth-Third that are making their own payday loans. I hope their CAMELS rating reflects a low grade for the M in CAMELS.
Apparently they do not understand positioning to win or even what banking is about. They do not understand their need to influence public policy and they will never have an argument to relax Dodd-Frank because they just want to perpetuae the abuse of their customers and prospects. Couple this with the other lead story today about the public losing trust in the regulators and I hope the result is that the CFPB hits them with UDAAP fines.
Posted by FrankRauscher | Thursday, March 28 2013 at 9:07AM ET
In an ideal world I would love to see these companies outlawed, but as this is not an ideal world there will always be people who are so desperate for money that they will borrow it from anyone who will lend it to them. At least with pay day installment loans there is some sort of contract and regulation. Better that then people go to a loan shark who will threaten physical violence to a person's family if the loan is not paid.
Posted by tommy0 | Friday, March 29 2013 at 5:52AM ET
With the logic of tommyO, the Nanny State will be needed to solve anyones lack of self-discipline. Why not allow Food Stamps to be used to make the payday loan payments directly instead of making the recipient "exchange them into cash" at a discount. No matter how you look at it, taxpayers are subsidizing people that have been lured into this financial trap.
Posted by FrankRauscher | Friday, March 29 2013 at 9:25AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.