= Subscriber content; or subscribe now to access all American Banker content.

Foreclosure Settlement Amounts to Peanuts for Most Borrowers

WASHINGTON — Most of the checks that borrowers will receive from mortgage servicers as a result of an independent foreclosure settlement will be small and likely to disappear quickly.

More than half of the roughly 4 million borrowers affected by the settlement will receive a mere $300. Overall, three-quarters of those borrowers who were in the foreclosure process between 2009 and 2010 will receive less than $1,000.

The $9.3 billion settlement with the 13 large mortgage servicers has been heavily criticized by lawmakers and consumer advocates after the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Board called off an independent foreclosure review process in January to get faster payouts to borrowers.

The payout details released Tuesday are likely to add more fuel to that fire.

"To me, it's a disappointing moment in an otherwise very disappointing process," said Debby Goldberg, special project director at the National Fair Housing Alliance. The categories "make it unnecessarily complicated and it creates a big spread between folks at the top and folks at bottom with no basis for doing that."

Regulators determined how much each borrower would receive based on their status of foreclosure or modification as well as whether the borrower filed a request for review before a regulatory deadline.

While affected borrowers will receive at least some money, the amounts do not take into account whether there was actual harm, critics say.

The cash compensation spans from $300 to $125,000 per person, most of which will go out this month with the final round sent out by mid-July.

A majority of the borrowers who are receiving the lowest amount had either been approved for modification, or the servicer did not engage a modification or loss mitigation as of the end of 2011. The 1,135 borrowers receiving the highest amount of $125,000 went through full foreclosure and were either service members who did not get appropriate legal protection or were not actually in default.

Yet some borrowers still in the foreclosure process — who were not actually in default — will receive far less. Such borrowers will receive $5,000 instead of the full $125,000 if their foreclosures were not completed by late 2011.

"It's just too little, much too late given the magnitude of the problem," said John Taylor, the head of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. "It's a dismal part of history when it comes to mortgage finance."

According to statistics provided by regulators, there were more than 600 cases where borrowers were in the foreclosure process despite never being in default. At a minimum, that statistic is likely to be used to combat claims by banks that they did not foreclose on borrowers who were on-time with their payments.

Yet the lack of details on the statistics leave open the possibility that there were other legitimate reasons behind the foreclosure, even if critics are likely to be skeptical.

Some borrowers will also receive less if they failed to file for remediation.

Nearly 90% of the borrowers identified as part of the settlement will receive a smaller amount because they did not file a request for review with regulators by the deadline. Those who did file a request received almost twice as much in cash for the same categories. For example, the 763 borrowers who filed a review request after being foreclosed on while under bankruptcy protection will receive $62,500. But borrowers in a similar situation who did not file a request — a total estimated as 5,075 people -- will receive $31,250.

"The outreach process that was conducted was very flawed … there were a lot of people who never knew this process was going on," Goldberg said. "And they certainly never knew filing would make a big difference in how much money they would get."

Regulators at least identified a large number of borrowers that will receive some kind of compensation quickly. The first wave of more than one million checks totaling $1.2 billion in checks will be sent out Friday. Had the regulators proceeded with the costly and prolonged independent foreclosure review, it's unclear whether the same amount of people would have received something similar and when.

"Under Comptroller [Thomas] Curry, there has been a real effort to get money to people as quickly as possible and that has been a sea change" at the agency, said Ruth Susswein, deputy director of national priorities for Consumer Action. "However, the fact that some people who have been egregiously harmed may end up with a few hundred dollars is, at a minimum, inadequate."

There is no appeals process if a borrower disputes the payout amount or category they've been placed under. But regulators said Tuesday that borrowers who receive a check can also take other legal action with their servicer. Servicers are not allowed to ask these borrowers to waive legal action in relation to the payments.

"The OCC says it's committed to helping people here," Susswein said. "So I hope that ends up being exactly what happens."

The other $5.7 billion from the settlement will be credits to the servicers for offering foreclosure prevention assistance to affected borrowers based on the full unpaid balance of the mortgage. That, too, has created concerns for consumer advocates who argue servicers will be more likely to help borrowers with larger mortgage amounts to get a larger credit than the low-to-middle income borrowers.

"It's going to be hard to use the provisions as they've been written to steer servicers to actions that would save" more people, Goldberg said. "There is some renewed attention to issues, both at the Fed and OCC, and a desire to help save homes but whether they put it into practice is a question."


(7) Comments



Comments (7)
Shouldn't there be a full government investigation of the matter so that a report can be prepared? Call it

Report of the National Commission on the Intervention of Consultants & Lobbyists and Sovereignty of Federal & State Regulators.

Since the public, former homeowners and current homeowners have been robbed of their equity and dignity, there should be a "humanitarian intervention" to stop further coercive action. The government has a duty to protect the public from harmful actions of consultants, lobbyists and bank regulators.
Posted by Dwihas3 | Saturday, April 13 2013 at 12:29AM ET
I lost my husband a few years ago to cancer. I am 52 years old and disabled. I thought I would spend the rest of my years in my home. But thanks to some of the unfair things they did to me they managed to legally steal it from me. Now they are going to give me $300 and I should be greatful I am being compensated for my loss? Nice job. I feel so much better now. Now I have to pay 50% in rent than was my mortgage payment. That $300 is sure going to help me.
Posted by Sassy | Friday, April 12 2013 at 7:45AM ET
A cynic might wonder if a settlement (like this) that provides more economic benefit to well-connected consulting firms than it does to the intended borrowers enhances the chances of retiring regulators to be hired by the consultancies?
Posted by jim_wells | Wednesday, April 10 2013 at 12:17PM ET
as usual !! what a joke !! they call this a settlement ??
Posted by eman2013 | Wednesday, April 10 2013 at 11:36AM ET
The OCC and the well-connected consultants the agency forced the big banks to hire to review foreclosure files should be compelled to restore some $4 billion to the fund that rightfully belongs homeowners harmed by unjust foreclosure actions.
Posted by jim_wells | Wednesday, April 10 2013 at 10:41AM ET
Lets hear from the National Fair Housing Alliance as to what they wanted by way of settlement! The public doesn't understand that when you take what appear to be huge fines and spread the proceeds around to millions of people, the result is what you have here - tiny amounts of money going to the "harmed" with no real impact. This sort of redistribution looks great for the political classes, in the press, but only serves to damage the economy as a whole. I am sure the National Fair Housing Alliance would love to just liquidate the companies involved - confiscate their assets and then increase the pool of cash by further Federal subsidies. In their opinion you would then have a real settlement. Fortunately that is not what happened in this case, but taking money from the financial industry and giving to the so-called "victims" is possible the wave of the future. Get ready!!
Posted by rmartin47 | Wednesday, April 10 2013 at 9:07AM ET
The checks will help America to learn a new legal term: disgorgement. A few of the less evolved will go on about the free handout, and how they should have stopped making their payments so they could live off the hard working. No one who has lost all of their equity will spew such vitriol. We are too busy trying to avoid that fast slide down to the lower classes. Once it becomes obvious the Fed won't really tickle their throats, it will be up to the more active citizens to identify where the money really went. The days of "supervisory information" are numbered: see http://www.desolationpress.com/essays/supervisoryinfo.html for a taste of what comes next.
Posted by teknoscribe | Tuesday, April 09 2013 at 9:25PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.