Quantcast

First Data CEO Judge to Step Down, Cites Health Reasons

JAN 11, 2013 6:17pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(1) Comment

The chief executive officer of First Data Corp. (FDC) is resigning, the company said Friday.

Jonathan Judge told the Atlanta payments processor that he will step down from his roles as First Data CEO and a board member no later than March 31. He is resigning for health reasons, First Data said in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

First Data has agreed to pay Judge $7.5 million following his resignation, a sum equal to two years' base pay plus a target bonus.

Judge has been at the helm of First Data since September 2010. Before joining the firm, he spent six years as president and CEO of Paychex, Inc.

"While my plans didn't anticipate such an early retirement, those plans needed to be changed for the benefit of my health," Judge said in a news release. "The directors have been very understanding and very gracious in their accommodation."

"We appreciate all the results Jon has accomplished at First Data," Chairman Joe Forehand said in the release. "He has provided great leadership and helped us take action to make First Data a great place to work. Jon has helped the company drive a customer-first focus. Over the last eight quarters under Jon's leadership First Data's [earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization] has grown significantly. We've made great progress in bringing new, innovative products to market. … We will miss Jon's leadership and wish him well in his recovery."

Forehand, who is also a former CEO of Accenture, will lead the search for Judge's replacement, according to a First Data official. First Data will consider both internal and external candidates, the official said.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Seven Stories in Regulation and Reform You Shouldn’t Miss

Editor-at-Large Barbara A. Rehm broke an exclusive story last week detailing the results of the OCC's private tests of the 19 largest banks on corporate governance. The results are shocking. (Image: Thinkstock)

Comments (1)
Isn't a bonus supposed to be awarded for exceptional performance during the previous period? If a CEO has resigned, for whatever reason, why should they be given a prospective bonus when, by definition, they are no longer performing work for the company? (I presume that Mr. Judge was awarded bonuses for prior years performance.) What benefit do the shareholders get in return for this payment? Sounds like another example of a board enriching an executive at the expense of shareholders.
Posted by david529 | Monday, January 14 2013 at 1:43PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.