Credit Union Files Class Action Against Target for Card Data Breach

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

Alabama State Employees Credit Union has filed the first class action lawsuit by a financial services company against Target Corp. over costs from the massive card security data breach the retailer suffered from Black Friday to mid-December.

The suit, filed Monday in an Alabama federal court, seeks compensation for financial losses resulting from defrauded deposits of financial institution members and customers, as well as costs associated with closing accounts and reissuing checks, debit cards and credit cards as a result of Target's data breach.

"Because Target failed to maintain adequate computer data security of customer credit and debit card information, it exposed millions of people to the risk of fraud and identity theft, and violated their privacy rights," said Jere L. Beasley, a shareholder at Beasley Allen Crown Methvin Portis & Miles PC, the Montgomery, Ala.-based law firm that is representing ASECU in the case. "Target could have taken steps to ensure the safety of its information technology systems. Instead, people were left scrambling at the holiday season, unsure of their financial security."

This is the second class action filed against the Minneapolis retail giant over the data breach. It is estimated that more than 40 million accounts were compromised.

Beasley Allen also filed a class action suit Dec. 20 on behalf of consumers whose credit and debit card information was compromised at Target stores.

Under Alabama law, the $212 million-asset ASECU must initially ask for a minimum of $5 million in damages, but the firm expects the final figure to be in the "hundreds of millions of dollars" after other financial services firms, including some banks, join the class action.

ASECU's complaint states that as a result of the breach of Target's security, the credit union was required to "expend time, energy and expense to address and resolve these financial disruptions and mitigate the consequences by refunding loss deposits; issuing new credit and debit cards; closing compromised or suspected-to-be compromised accounts; opening new accounts; and increased costs in monitoring customer and member accounts to determine which transactions are legitimate or fraudulent."

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

SEE MORE IN

'The Law Penalizes the Consumers It Set Out to Protect': Comments of the Week

American Banker readers share their views on the most pressing banking topics of the week. As excerpted from the Comments sections of AmericanBanker.com articles.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

The Most Influential Women in Payments

What does it take to lead in the still-mostly-male world of payments? This year's 20 Most Influential Women in Payments share stories about how they got to the top, their vision for the future of payments (hint: it's mainly mobile), and advice to other women working their way up the ladder.
DAILY ENEWSLETTER UPDATE

A Newsletter featuring Bank Technology News' top stories plus special reports and data

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.