Horse-drawn buggies may not be the only throwbacks welcoming visitors to Pennsylvania Dutch country this summer.
Eighteen investors—many of them Amish—are planting the seeds for a new community bank outside Lancaster, Pa.
If the investors can convince regulators that the new institution will thrive, Bank of Bird-in-Hand would become the first de novo in the United States in more than two years. Organizers filed applications in early January with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and the state Department of Banking and Securities.
Though many are watching its progress with regulators closely, the hopeful startup is unlikely to see much company, at least over the next year, according to lawyers, consultants and investment bankers. The regulatory and economic factors that froze de novo activity for the last few years remain in force. In addition, changes in technology and customer behavior could conspire to make the traditional startup a thing of the past—or at least a lot more difficult.
"It is harder on all fronts," says Nicholas Bybel Jr., an attorney in Harrisburg, Pa., who is advising the group in Bird-in-Hand, a small farming community east of Lancaster. Most of the organizers were involved in another local startup, HomeTowne Heritage Bank, which was sold in 2003 to National Penn Bancshares Inc., in Boyertown, Pa.
The new effort is being looked at as a bellwether by industry observers. It is helpful for gauging just how much harder the de novo process has become.
Many attorneys and consultants feel the FDIC has been discouraging the formation of new banks since late 2008, preferring that investors plow money into existing institutions that need capital to survive. In 2009, the agency tightened oversight of startups, which have been rare in the years since. The country's last new bank, the $39 million-asset Start Community Bank in New Haven, Conn., opened in the fourth quarter of 2010.
"I've had groups communicate with me about the possibility of forming a de novo bank in the traditional model, and I have at this point been discouraging them from pursuing it, just because the time frame and the regulatory hurdles are so severe," says James Rockett, a lawyer with Bingham McCutchen in San Francisco.
Even if regulators become more open to de novos, the application process is unquestionably longer and more difficult than it was before the financial crisis, according to attorneys and consultants who advise bank organizers.
"It's a literal minefield right now trying to figure out what they want," says Charles Ingram, a managing director at Dallas-based investment bank Commerce Street Capital LLC.
But some requirements are clear. Having a niche—one that is demonstrably underserved-is a prerequisite for any new community bank aiming for regulatory approval, experts say.
"I would not bet very heavily on that generic business bank," says Jim Deitch, who has founded two banks and is now CEO of TeraVerde Management Advisers, a consulting firm in Lancaster, Pa.
Bank of Bird-in-Hand proposes to cater to Amish and Mennonite farmers and small-business owners in eastern Lancaster, a target market that the organizers say is underserved.
About 30,000 Amish people live in Lancaster County, along with 29,000 Mennonites and other Anabaptists, according to the Pennsylvania Dutch Convention and Visitors Bureau. The demographic is reflected in plans for the bank's headquarters, formerly the home of a prominent local doctor: Adequate off-street parking will be available for vehicles and horse-drawn carriages and wagons, the FDIC application notes.
Roughly half the bank's loans are expected to go to farms with annual sales of less than $500,000. The bank also intends to offer online banking for both retail and business customers.























































I am a consultant to the banking industry and this story made laugh, a lot!
The problem is neither the Regulators nor the industry. As an example, one of the above whining consultants was negative on the Amish new bank and said; ""I think that's the real issue-the customer behaviors. They're not going to want to go to branches anymore." This statement is correct, which is why Ally, Capital One, and USAA are doing so well. But in Amish country, there is a reluctance to rely on technology, so a traditional model would work.
Know your market and client.
Many of those quoted above were very down. Another cites the past ability to open banks with just a few hundred thousand dollars. Just because you could do something in the past does not mean it was a good idea. This writer is a consultant to banks and Regulators. Just yesterday I had a long conversation with the Kansas City Fed. Regulators are not trying to shutter small banks, quite the opposite.
To each of the parties quoted in this story I would say stop whining and man-up. If you cannot adapt to a changing environment then it is time to retire. The best thing you could do to help yourselves and your practice is to read an excellent paper. It was published in January 2013 by the GAO. The paper is titled; "Causes and Consequences of Recent Bank Failures". Do a Google search and you will find it. This paper articulates the nature of Regulator concerns. Address this paper and you will have little problem with Regulators.
To any small banks or those considering opening a bank; expect more from your consultant. If they spend time whining, try a new one. There is no doubt the world has changed. But not all change is bad. I have just begun marketing my new models for small banks. If you are having trouble, call me.
Timothy Alexander
Managing Director
Triune
tim@triunegfs.com
www.triunegfs.com
805/402-4943 M
Just to clarify for all of our readers, the writer of this piece is not a consultant to banks or regulators (though he did interview and quote several for this story). The writer is a journalist and college journalism instructor in Pennsylvania.
While we welcome contributions from consultants, bankers and regulators for our opinion pages (i.e. the Commentary page of American Banker Magazine, and the BankThink blog on the American Banker website), our magazine's news stories are reported, written and edited by journalists.
Sincerely,
Heather Landy, Editor in Chief
American Banker Magazine
Sadly, too many Bank operate without the benefit of a sound business strategy, which begins to explain their less than impressive performance in the eyes of their customers and shareholders. Luckily, this is something that can be addressed within a relatively short period of time... assuming that Bank executives recognize the need and lead.