A forthcoming study of bank performance from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis has found that bigness is a better indicator than location of an institution's susceptibility to distress or collapse.

Sifting for patterns in bank failures between 1983 and 1991, authors John H. Boyd and Mark Gertler report that banks with more than $1 billion of assets were more likely to succumb than their smaller countersparts in the same region.

Subscribe Now

Access to authoritative analysis and perspective and our data-driven report series.

14-Day Free Trial

No credit card required. Complete access to articles, breaking news and industry data.