Hard as it is to defend the Byzantine nature of U.S. bank supervision, it's at least as hard to find a model guaranteed to provide a better defense against financial crises.

None of the four major approaches to supervisory structure seen in the rest of the developed world proved uniformly impervious to the latest boom-bust cycle. For example, the U.K. experience raised serious questions about the wisdom of the so-called integrated model, in which regulatory powers are consolidated into a single agency keeping tabs on all kinds of financial firms. A more "functional" approach, with separate regulators specializing in different aspects of finance, did not protect Spain from a real estate bubble severe enough to rival our own.

Limited Time Offer

Save $400 off your subscription. Special offer ends April 30, 2017.

14-Day Free Trial

No credit card required. Complete access to articles, breaking news and industry data.