A federal judge has barred the Department of Housing and Urban  Development from enforcing a blanket policy of refusing to insure reverse   mortgages obtained with help from estate planning services.   
The temporary restraining order was issued last Thursday.
  
HUD had announced the policy in a March 17 letter that complained of  high fees some firms were charging to seniors. The agency "considers the   use of such estate planning services in the loan origination process to   constitute an imprudent and irresponsible business practice of a serious   nature," the letter said.       
A HUD investigation begun last month found that some third-party  originators were charging as much as 10% of the amount borrowed to make   these loans.   
  
The restraining order, by Judge Harold Greene of U.S. District Court for  the District of Columbia, came in response to a suit filed by Patriot Inc.   and America's Trust Inc., two companies cited in HUD's letter.   
HUD did not follow proper rulemaking procedures, said Sharon Babbin, a  Washington-based lawyer for the two San Juan Capistrano, Calif., insurance   companies.   
The department "can't issue rules without following procedure," she  said. 
  
HUD responded with a two-paragraph letter, signed by Federal Housing  Commissioner Nicolas P. Retsinas. "The department will not implement or   enforce the provisions" of the March 17 letter "until further notice," the   new letter said.     
A HUD spokesman said the agency is "determined" to stop the companies  from charging senior citizens for helping them through the reverse mortgage   process. "We believe our directive was proper and will be reinstated in   future court action," the spokesman said. "Our actions have helped save   senior citizens around the country from falling victim to these scams."       
But the companies argue that HUD does not market the loans or educate  senior citizens about them, so the estate planners must do so. Reverse   mortgages are "like a well-kept secret," said Todd Bauman, senior vice   president at America's Financial, a Las Vegas estate planning firm that was   making these loans using an America's Trust package. "These estate planners   are out marketing and have people educating seniors about them, and that   costs money."           
America's Financial stopped working with America's Trust when it learned  the company was being investigated, Mr. Bauman said. "Now, I tell seniors   to call HUD directly," he said.   
  
The companies being investigated provide a valuable service, said Ms.  Babbin, the lawyer for two of them. 
A representative from the American Association of Retired Persons said  it is "not at liberty to comment on the court decision" but questioned the   argument that the advisers were being fairly compensated for necessary   services.     
"For $8,000 to $10,000?" the spokeswoman asked. "What does it cost to  drive someone to an appointment or locate documents?" These agents may be   performing nominal services, she said, but "nothing that approaches the   fees that they're charging."     
Lenders who fund this kind of loan say they are still refusing to accept  such business. 
Some sources also said Fannie Mae had refused to buy loans originated by  estate planners. But a spokeswoman said, "Fannie Mae has no intention of   stopping its purchases of mortgages originated through the HUD program. We   believe it's a very good program."