Last week's takeover of check processor Nationar by the New York State  Banking Department pointed to several shortcomings in the way the trust   company was seized, industry officials said.   
High on the list of bankers' criticisms was the timing of the seizure -  early in the morning of Feb. 6 - demonstrating what they said was a   failure to foresee the consequences for the payments system.   
  
Several industry sources, who requested anonymity, said it was unusual  for an institution to be taken over on a Monday morning. The New York State   Banking Department and the Federal Reserve should have seized Nationar   after the close of business Friday if they knew that the bank was   insolvent, officials said.       
The main line of business of Nationar, formerly known as Savings Bank  and Trust Co., was providing check processing services to savings banks,   credit unions, and retailers in the New York area. It processed about $90   million worth of checks daily.     
  
"This whole situation . . . kind of caught us by surprise," said one  East Coast banker whose institution was owed over $1 million by Nationar   clients when the company was seized.   
The banker said his institution was left in the lurch for the better  part of a week before it recovered approximately $1.3 million from   Nationar.   
"We did try and draw down on Monday against cash letters that we sent on  Friday night," said the source, who added that his bank had recently found   Nationar to be sound after reviewing several correspondent bank   relationships. "We were unable to draw down against those cash letters"   until Feb. 9.       
  
But what distressed him the most was the lack of information from  regulators, the banker said. He said that although his bank was confident   it would eventually receive its money, the lack of a public statement by   regulators was disconcerting.     
"There was virtually no information available to us from any source as  to why they took the action and what the chances were that we were going to   be able to collect," the banker said.   
He added his bank will revisit its procedures in assessing the risks on  where it sends its cash letters. "Ultimately, the responsibility lies with   us."   
Meanwhile, others said the seizure created a week's worth of chaos for  the New York Clearing House Association, which spent marathon sessions   unwinding or updating automated clearing house transactions.   
  
"As I understand the Nationar problem, it festered all day long" on Feb.  6, said George White, president of White Papers Inc., a Montclair, N.J.-   based payment systems consulting company.   
"It was apparently resolved at four o'clock in the afternoon, but it  still held up a million ACH transactions from being processed." 
Mr. White said at least Nationar's seizure would serve as an example  for regulators. 
"This illustrates how important it is that if a failure of an  institution occurs, particularly one that is settling for others as well,   that the regulatory authorities have procedures in place on how to handle   it," Mr. White said.     
Thomas M. O'Brien, president and CEO of North Side Savings Bank, Floral  Park, N.Y., said the run on Nationar occurred following reports of   potential liquidity problems.   
"Confidence became a problem and that threatened liquidity," Mr. O'Brien  said. "I think that's what caused the Banking Department to act." 
Neil D. Levin, acting superintendent of the Banking Department,  explained that the seizure came after several marathon meetings conducted   over the weekend Feb. 4, in an effort to save the institution.   
"There was a good chance that we could have made some changes that would  have meant not taking possession, so we went the extra mile and tried to do   that," Mr. Levin said. "Unfortunately, we couldn't work it out."   
Knowledgeable sources said Nationar's board of directors attempted to  recapitalize Nationar in an effort to increase the bank's liquidity, but   sources said some of the key stockholders balked at that move.   
Nationar has approximately $1.5 billion dollars in assets. Besides check  processing for other banks, it provided trust and mutual fund   administration services for member institutions and had approximately $2   billion under management.     
Jonathan D. Epstein contributed to this article.