BankThink

'Push' pay can nudge security, bank branding and merchant acquiring

Successful technology disruption will require merchants to create new account-to-account checkout experiences using financial institution-branded "push" payment instruments to flip the transaction flow from "pull” to “push."

When financial institutions and merchants smartly enable push transactions there are several benefits: Institutions benefit by regaining brand presence at the point of sale, reclaiming revenue from other financial services providers, and by generating new income streams from new services; consumers benefit from additional security because push payments do not reveal their credentials and are guaranteed that they will not spend money that they do not have; and merchants benefit from lower payment acceptance costs, lower cash transfer costs, faster cash settlement, reduced chargebacks and refunds.

The new U.S. payments rails enable B-to-C and B-to-B “push” payments through existing P-to-P platforms. When financial institutions and merchants use them as account-to-account platforms, successful disruption can occur.

venmo on phone
The Ebay Inc. Venmo application (app) is arranged for a photograph on an Apple Inc. iPhone 5s in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, Aug. 22, 2014. After downloading the Venmo mobile-payment app onto a smartphone, users can connect them to bank and credit-card accounts, and then link up with friends to send and receive money on-the-go. Venmo, based in New York, alone handled $314 million in mobile payments in the first quarter of this year, up 62 percent from the prior quarter. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

The U.S. lags behind Asia/Pacific A-to-A schemes thanks to an oversaturation of credit cards (in 2014, 57% of Americans used a credit card vs. only 11% of East Asians). The most popular P-to-P schemes such as Venmo are still linked to an underlying payment card, meant to benefit “pull” payment incumbents: the top 20 issuers and card schemes.

Outside of the top Issuers, financial institutions collect little net revenue from interchange raising cost-to-income ratios (expense as a “%” of income). Even though global peers collect less interchange, U.S. financial institutions have higher cost-to-income ratios (28% vs. 59%). It is getting tougher to compete globally.

In addition, cards have cut financial institution brands out of the checkout experience. Customers don’t pay with their branded card, they pay with their Visa/Mastercard card. Fragmentation of digital wallets has further obfuscated financial institution brand recognition. On top of that, millennials aren’t getting credit cards; so account acquisition becomes limited.

This is where Zelle and real-time payments come in. Both “push” transactions from the sender’s financial account to the receiver’s. Both services provide real-time money transfers with zero interchange, no consumer credit risk, no customer information in transit, and no chargeback risk. Plus, both are faster than Same Day ACH.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
P-to-P payments B-to-B payments Retailers Branding ISO and agent
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER