Quantcast
BANKTHINK

Face It, Bankers: You’re Not Apple

OCT 6, 2011 12:03pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(8) Comments

Everyman is a 42-year old marketing middle manager in a suburb of Cincinnati. In the morning, he gets into his Prius, dodges minor traffic, sits through a few meetings. Most days he buys a sandwich for lunch. Fighting off a nap, he flirts with a co-worker, emails his wife, goes home, has dinner, interacts with his kids, and falls asleep on the couch. Once a week maybe he gets some cash.

Point is, short of using a debit card at Subway or to fill up the tank, he isn't engaging the banking system at all on a daily basis. And that's just the way he wants it.

For him, for the vast majority of Americans, the role of the bank is to be there when the customer wants it to be there. Like the water company. Like the electric company. Engaging with one's bank — sticking a card in an ATM, basically — should be as simple, mindless and consistently efficient as turning on the tap or an overhead light.

What does this mean for banks? That they, in turn, are expected to act like utilities, providing a basic 21st-century human right (access to cash) just as the water company provides water and the electric company electricity. And that's about it, no matter how many cross-selling products they come up with, no matter how modern their mobile banking services (which, by the way, the vast majority of Americans could not care less about).

It also means banks should realize what they are not: vibrant companies on the cusp of innovation with galloping stock prices creating emotional consumer attachments. Dudes, you are not Apple. For Americans, banks should simply do no harm. Innovation isn't a core expectation. Neither are fees that nickel and dime on a product-line-by-product-line basis, and whose structure bears no resemblance to that of the bank across the street.

Ultimately, this is the message contained in the birth of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Occupy Wall Street movement, the crackdown on overdraft fees, the slew of lawsuits around mortgages, the Durbin Amendment, and the Illinois senator's recent comments damning banks for charging for debit cards. If it wasn't un-American to nationalize utilities, the banks would've been nationalized by now. Since that's not going to happen, we're seeing the government assert its authority over the banks in piecemeal fashion, regulation by regulation, sound bite by sound bite.

Is all hope lost? Probably not. Americans have short memories, after all, and everyone gets a second chance. If banks want to reduce their reputational risk, the hostility that surrounds them, and the rules and regulations that limit them, the very first thing they need to understand is what's expected of them, and what is not. At that point, maybe they can work the political and financial systems around the margins to improve their prospects over and above those of sheer commodity providers. But that's where it starts.

Repeat after me: Water. Electricity. Cash.

Andy Sobel is the managing editor of American Banker. 

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(8) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
The Week's Best Quotes: Holder's 'Too Big to Jail' Cop, Big-Bank Influence

The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide. (Image: Fotolia)

Comments (8)
And that is exactly why people say "I have to go to the bank" (and not I want to go to th bank).
Posted by smoot | Friday, October 07 2011 at 11:07AM ET
So true. As soon as Bankers tried to become marketers and get creative it was all over! When you have lending officers out hitting up the local business for their accounts, then the local prospect says "Sure, I need a loan" the Banker feels somewhat obligated to make that loan even if it's got a few warts on it. When times are good, that not too great loan performs but then comes a local or global downturn and.....well we know what happened. Along with many other mistakes. It all was driven by bonuses. I was in a meeting in 2006 with the Regional Credit Manager of a pretty good sized regional bank and he said in essence "Our loan losses are too low, you are leaving business on the table" I'm sure that was not a unique experience. The same thing is happening with tech innovation. Check 21 is great but not much else has come along that will change the way people bank. Online, ATM and as a last resort drive thru or go into the bank.
Posted by SteveCharger | Friday, October 07 2011 at 1:18PM ET
Someone once gave the same advice to Apple about what customers want out of a computer. Good thing he had the capacity to challenge the norm and embrace innovation.
Posted by sgray24 | Friday, October 07 2011 at 2:21PM ET
Andy, On the subject "Banks are not Apple Computer," you wrote: "(Banks) are expected to act like utilities, providing a basic 21st-century human right (access to cash) just as the water company provides water and the electric company electricity. And that's about it." At one level, sure. On the other hand, if banks were ALSO to return to their roots based in financial expertise, I think they could create more of an Apple-like experience. Could you imagine a bank branch or call center equivalent of the Genius Bar where someone could take ANY banking question and get it answered expertly? Or how about the Apple sales people who work the floor in an Apple Store? Imagine if bank branch staff were consistently that knowledgeable, that friendly? And how about traffic management in the Apple Store? It could happen in a branch. And what about all those "distractors" in the Apple Store, like the cool laptops sitting out to be played with? You could do THAT in a branch, too, with machines that had, for example, different calculators and short lessons in personal finance. The trouble is that banks have consistently cut cost, cut cost, and cut cost. For the most part (despite the best efforts of people at many banks), branch personnel are underpaid, under-trained, and under-supported in almost any way possible EXCEPT around compliance and control. In sum, there could be a LOT of similarities to Apple.
Posted by 35291765 | Sunday, October 09 2011 at 10:35PM ET
If the banking industry were a utility that never tried to introduce any innovative products, the card and ATM you mention would not exist, Andy. And as far as the percentage of people who say they don't care about mobile banking, recall that Ford once said if he'd asked people what they wanted, they would have asked for faster horses.
Posted by bmcgeer | Tuesday, October 11 2011 at 1:57PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.