Quantcast
JAN 12, 2012 2:25pm ET

Web Seminars

Are You and Your Data Compliance Ready? Understanding the Data Management Implications of Dodd Frank
Available On Demand

Why the CFPB Will Resonate on the Campaign Trail

Print
Reprints
Email

WASHINGTON — It's strange to remember, but financial services policy used to be so low down on the totem poll of political importance that it was big news when a President even mentioned the words "Fannie Mae" in a speech.

The financial crisis changed all that, but sometimes I think the banking lobby doesn't know that.

Since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau launched last year, many lobbyists and analysts I talk to have suggested that the agency will never really register on voters' radar. The average citizen, according to them, will care far more about bigger issues, like the economy, or social issues, like gay marriage.

But when it comes to the CFPB, the industry is dead wrong. President Obama has clearly taken steps to put the CFPB center stage in his battle to stay in the White House.

He's right to do so. Just from talking to my friends, whose interest in banking issues ranges from zero to outright hostility, the CFPB has been gaining popular attention.

If Obama continues to raise the agency's profile — and all signs indicate he will — the effort could significantly boost his campaign among Democrats, independents and, yes, even some swing Republicans.

Here's why:

1) It's a potent, easy-to-understand symbol
Most Americans probably won't be thinking about the CFPB fight on Election Day, but it is likely to color their impression of the two presidential candidates, particularly Obama. The CFPB represents a concrete accomplishment of his first term and it helps solidify the notion that he is sticking up for consumers versus Wall Street. Republicans want to paint the CFPB as another "bureaucratic solution," hoping to gin up some Tea Party-fervor against the agency, but I don't think that flies. What limited polls have been conducted show that Americans of all political ideologies generally support an agency dedicated to protecting them from unscrupulous banks, lenders and check cashers.

2) It plays well against Mitt Romney
Assuming Romney is the Republican presidential candidate, it's pretty clear the Obama campaign will seek to portray him as a corporate vulture who cares more about businesses than people. The fact that Romney is on record calling for a repeal of the CFPB along with the rest of Dodd-Frank makes him vulnerable.

"The White House is imagining this issue in the context of Mitt Romney as GOP nominee," said Larry Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics. "Right now the non-Romney GOP candidates are helping President Obama by focusing so heavily on Bain Capital, defining Romney as a rich corporate raider who swooped in for the money kill and cost loads of average people their jobs. Contrast that with Obama, who is 'fighting for the average man and woman in the never-ending battle against banks and Wall Street to avoid getting screwed.'Simplistic? You bet. Will it sell with lots of voters? Undoubtedly."

3) Obama gains from every CFPB victory
The president made the CFPB front-page news with his recess appointment of Richard Cordray as its director. Since then he has continued to mention it in speeches, his weekly radio address and at fundraisers. And it's only been one week. Imagine what he'll do when the CFPB announces an enforcement action against a big bank or nonbank.

And make no mistake, those actions are already on their way, with Cordray saying last week there were several in the pipeline. Each action will fuel a spate of headlines about how the government, in this case the CFPB, is fighting back against banks. Cordray will get credit, but since Obama created the agency, there's little doubt he will receive significant political benefits as well. Obama clearly thinks so. In his address to CFPB employees last week — which seemed like more of a campaign rally than anything else — Obama repeatedly used the word "we" when referring to the agency's work. "We can help give everyone the clear and transparent information that they need to make informed financial decisions, and have companies compete for their business in an open and honest way," Obama said.

For every notch in CFPB's belt, Obama also receives a boost and reinforces to the American public how he is keeping them safe. To me, that assures the CFPB will be a prominent issue in the presidential campaign.

What do you think? Do you think voters will care about the CFPB?

Comments (15)
Absolutely this will matter to voters, especially if CFPB comes up in Obama/Romney debates. I, for one, can't wait to hear Romney explain to millions of viewers why he would aim to eliminate an agency whose sole mission is to protect consumers. Alan Kline, online news editor, American Banker.
Posted by klinea | Thursday, January 12 2012 at 2:35PM ET
You make a great point, Alan. I think Romney and the GOP in general are in a tight spot. As others in the media have said, the Republicans are essentially making a process argument rather than a policy one, at least when it comes to the recess appointment of Cordray. Process arguments are good for lawyers, but nobody else really cares. -- Rob Blackwell, Washington bureau chief, American Banker
Posted by rblackwe | Thursday, January 12 2012 at 2:47PM ET
Let's not sell them short entirely, Rob. Republicans kept up a pretty consistent message for months about why they were blocking Cordray's nomination: they wanted more accountability in Washington, especially from a new government bureaucracy. I do think that's a simple message that resonates with Republican voters, if the GOP can stick to it. Democrats have definitely put them on the defensive though. --Kate Davidson, Washington reporter, American Banker
Posted by Katherine D | Thursday, January 12 2012 at 3:14PM ET
I'm wondering now whether the White House was aiming at this solution all along. A year ago. Not nominating Warren. Waiting for the electioneering to really begin. Waiting for just the right recess to make the appointment. Machiavellian? Perhaps.
Posted by andysobel | Thursday, January 12 2012 at 6:16PM ET
I'm wondering now whether the White House was aiming at this solution all along. A year ago. Not nominating Warren. Waiting for the electioneering to really begin. Waiting for just the right recess to make the appointment. Machiavellian? Perhaps. Andrew Sobel, Managing Editor, American Banker
Posted by andysobel | Thursday, January 12 2012 at 6:17PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

About BankThink

BankThink is a blog about ideas, trends, and other developments in financial services. Click here for editorial submission guidelines.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.