Quantcast
BANKTHINK
ACCOUNTABLE

Lax Law Enforcement Means MF Global Mistakes Will Be Repeated

NOV 11, 2011 10:13am ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(2) Comments

If you’re looking for lessons on risky business and recidivism, MF Global has them in spades.

Plenty has been written about Jon Corzine’s chronic habit of begging for forgiveness rather than asking for permission when taking outsized trading positions that ended in big losses. The financial services industry allows it if you wear your failure as a badge of honor and never apologize.

Jon Corzine, J. Christopher Flowers, and the rest of the MF Global gang have not yet been called to account for the disappearance of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Some media are nervous about putting boldfaced names of industry veterans like Corzine and MF Global investor Chris Flowers next to details about the missing $600 million in customer assets. They push an innocuous version of why the millions still haven’t been found — it’s a timing problem or there’s too much confusion and complexity — in spite of so much evidence now to the contrary.

For example, the CFTC told the bankruptcy court that the MF General Counsel emailed them hours after the bankruptcy filing on October 31 to say there was a "significant shortfall" in customer segregated funds. The SEC and CFTC issued a joint statement on November 1 characterizing the problem as “possible deficiencies in customer futures segregated accounts.” CME Group issued a statement on November 2 saying, “the firm made subsequent transfers of customer segregated funds in a manner that may have been designed to avoid detection.”

Bad behavior at MF Global long preceded Jon Corzine.

The MF Global 2009 proxy statement describes how investor Chris Flowers was instrumental in pushing, via a board seat for his lieutenant David Schamis, a bold, aggressive, new strategy for the “sleepy” futures clearing merchant. Flowers brought Corzine to MF Global in 2010 to sex up the place, cut costs, and make bets that would turn around three years of losses and allow him to recoup the investment he made to save the firm after an out of control wheat trader cost it $141 million in 2008.

MF Global, the brokerage firm that collapsed Oct. 31 after admitting that more than $600 million in client assets were missing, has a checkered past.

Bad acts go back to its roots as Refco, a Chicago futures brokerage that collapsed and filed bankruptcy in late 2005. After Man Financial spent $323 million to acquire Refco’s client assets and accounts following the bankruptcy, the Refco team was thrown in with the rest of the recent Man Group brokerage acquisitions until 2007. That’s when Man Financial spun off the brokerage business in an IPO and renamed it MF Global.

The U.S. Department of Justice accused Refco executive officers Phillip Bennett, Tone Grant, Santo Maggio, and Robert Trosten, and other former Refco insiders of directing a series of transactions every year from 1999 through 2005 (and quarterly starting in 2004) to hide customer trading losses, conceal the firm's proprietary trading activities, fraudulently shift expenses off Refco’s books and artificially pad Refco's revenues. The Refco executives’ objective was to achieve, through fraud, the 2004 leveraged buyout of Refco and the 2005 initial public offering of Refco stock, the Justice Department said.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(2) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Kumbaya Moment for Banks, CUs; Brown-Vitter as WMD: Week's Best Quotes
The most notable quotes from American Banker stories of the previous week. Readers are encouraged to add their own observations in the Comments fields at the bottom of each slide.

(Image: Fotolia)

Comments (2)
What is the responsibility of the CME, which declared all was well at MF Global just a few days before customer funds were reported as "lost"? If self-regulation is supposed to be effective, then industry organizations should take responsibility and use their own and member capital to cover losses. If not, bring on the regulation they complain about so much.
Posted by stschinkel | Sunday, November 13 2011 at 8:41AM ET
Until prosecutors understand one can prove "fraud" and the political will exists to prosecute bad guys no matter where they went to school or who they know. Look at the current administration. Do you see large numbers of very smart folks from local universities, small banks, or anything but white shoe firms? Nope? Well...if you went to Harvard with someone, or they are fellow alumni and brilliant just like you and just as "hard-working" and honest (presumptively) then you are not going to want to prosecute them. Remember who get BCCI? It was a crusading local (blue blood) DA who was never a part of the "club" (Bob Morganthau). When regulation becomes about enforcement rather than compliance, you'll get change. Until then, it's crony criminal and civil prosecution.
Posted by Mark S | Sunday, December 18 2011 at 11:40AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.