Quantcast

Nevada Files First Criminal Charges in Robo-Signing Case

NOV 16, 2011 9:51pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(1) Comment

In the first criminal case involving robo-signing of mortgage documents, Nevada's attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto filed charges Wednesday against two Lender Processing Services employees accused of filing tens of thousands of false documents.

The grand jury indictment filed with the Clark County Recorder's office accuses California residents Gary Trafford and Gerri Sheppard of overseeing teams of so-called "robo-signers" — people who allegedly churned out improper notices of default to initiate foreclosure proceedings. The defendants allegedly allowed their signatures to be forged and submitted to the county recorder.

In a statement on Thursday morning, Lender Processing Services conceded that some of its past document signing practices "were flawed," but said that it believed the resulting filings were legitimate and that no wrongful foreclosures had occurred.

More indictments are likely to be filed, according to John Kelleher, Nevada's chief deputy attorney general.

"Robo-signing is obviously going on en masse in Nevada," Kelleher said. "Most of the major banks seem to be clients" of the defendants' company.

The AG's office has not made allegations against banks themselves, he said. "We simply don't know if the major banks were aware of what these individuals were doing," according to Kelleher.

If banks sanctioned the alleged robo-signers' activities, Kelleher said, they could be the subject of future actions. "Our charge is to prosecute criminal activity by whomever may be committing it," he said. "There's no provision under the law for an industry to collectively decide to circumvent Nevada statutes."

In the case against Trafford and Sheppard, bail has been set at $500,000 each. The two defendants face more than 600 counts ranging from gross misdemeanors to felonies. An LPS spokeswoman said that the two had worked for LPS for "several years" and that the company had hired an attorney to defend them.

Whether the defendants worked for Lender Processing Services throughout the time period of the alleged violations is not clear. The Nevada Attorney General's office said that their company had changed names several times between 2005 and 2008.

The indictment represents a marked escalation in the fight over robo-signing and improper foreclosure documentation. Robo-signing practices are at the heart of what was a 50-state attorneys general investigation that recently has fractured over disagreements about liability waivers and the magnitude of possible bank punishments. Nevada's move appears to widen a rift between the coalition of state attorneys general pushing for a global settlement with banks and those taking more aggressive unilateral action.

In a statement on Thursday, LPS appeared to express surprise at the indictments.

"LPS recently learned of an inquiry from the Nevada Attorney General into its document execution practices and expressed its willingness to fully cooperate with the investigation," the company said. "Earlier this month, the Attorney General's office confirmed that the company was not a target of this inquiry."

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

 

 
Seven Stories in Regulation and Reform You Shouldn’t Miss

Editor-at-Large Barbara A. Rehm broke an exclusive story last week detailing the results of the OCC's private tests of the 19 largest banks on corporate governance. The results are shocking. (Image: Thinkstock)

Comments (1)
Who is going to believe that the banks were not familiar with robo-signing practices. Or rendering false testimony through affidavits, or forging documents. It is hard to understand the lack of accountability in this case that caused so much grief to millions of Americans. The intention seems to be to reach compensation solutions with small checks for consumers affected with the loss of their houses while trying to hide the real dimension of this crime. Most, if not all of the major banks, have deceived the courts and have filed for foreclosure of houses they had no right to foreclose on. The ones who had that right were the actual owners of those mortgages and they have not come to court against homeowners but against the same banks.
Is the law ever going to be applied? Are we not supposed to be all equal under the law? What makes those in Wall Street so special to the authorities? and I am not speaking of institutions but of executives in charged of those institutions.
Posted by mauriciott | Friday, November 18 2011 at 3:15PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Marketplace
Fiserv is a leading global provider of information management and electronic commerce systems for the financial services industry.
Learn More
Informa Research Services is the premier provider of competitive intelligence, mystery shopping, and compliance testing services to the financial industry.
Learn More
CSC is a leader in private-label, third-party loan servicing with 30+ years of proven experience in delivering effective, cost-effective solutions.
Learn More
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.