Attorneys Brawl Over Spoils of Overdraft Settlements — Again

Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (5)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

Money can complicate relationships. Several hundred million dollars can ruin them.

Plaintiffs' attorneys behind a group of wildly successful overdraft class action cases have been feuding over how to distribute hundreds of millions of dollars of court-approved legal fees, their share of more than $1 billion of settlements with banks. Now the federal judge overseeing the litigation has called a timeout.

Judge Lawrence King has issued an emergency injunction to stop a firm headed by Richard McCune from taking the dispute public in California state court. According to the order, McCune had threatened to file a lawsuit divulging details of the feud unless the lawyers coordinating the case paid his firm $19.25 million. The attorneys coordinating the overdraft litigation asked to Judge King to stop him.

The McCuneWright law firm's "threat to disclose … settlement and strategy discussions with co-Lead Counsel violates the privilege and confidentiality accorded such conversations," King wrote in the order. "There can be no question that this constitutes irreparable injury to both the members of the classes and to Class Counsel."

The judge wrote that McCune's unfiled suit relates to statements allegedly made to the lawyer about the division of attorneys' fees. At the end of the order, King added a handwritten note stating that "the court is available … for an immediate hearing" if requested by McCune's firm.

At the heart of the underlying litigation is banks' past practice of "resequencing" its customers' debit card payments. By subtracting a customer's largest daily charges first, banks increased the speed at which customer accounts went into the red and began incurring overdraft fees. The practice earned the banking industry billions of dollars over a decade.

Faced with a flurry of cases alleging bank misconduct, senior judges in the federal court system consolidated dozens in the courtroom of Judge King beginning in 2009. As is standard practice in such cases, King appointed an executive committee and co-lead counsels to coordinate the cases and the scores of trial attorneys.

Firms frequently jockey for such positions, which bring both strategic control of cases and influence over the proceeds of settlements or victories.

"The allocation of attorney assignments and the compensation of counsel for their efforts to advance the interests of all plaintiffs is a central aspect of multi-district litigation, and cannot be separated from the overall management and organization of the MDL," King wrote in the order.

Throughout the process, King has emphasized the need to keep the case moving in an orderly fashion, looking askance at efforts by banks to cut deals in other jurisdictions. In the order he cited concern that litigation over attorneys' fees in California would distract from the interest of the plaintiffs.

The dispute involving McCune is at least the second between attorneys angling for proceeds. A South American firm previously filed papers demanding to be paid for an early role in the case.

McCune did not immediately return a call seeking comment. Nor did the two lead counsels for the Plaintiffs' executive committee.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(5) Comments

SEE MORE IN

2014 Predictions Revisited: What the Seers Got Right and Wrong

A year ago we asked BankThink contributors to make bold predictions about how the financial industry would evolve in 2014. Here's a look back at their forecasts and the actual outcomes.

Comments (5)
This is really an interesting information in terms of law. I agree with Judge Lawrence King to stop the firm headed by Richard McCune from taking the dispute public in California state court because as I heard, McCune had threatened to file a lawsuit divulging details of the feud unless the lawyers coordinating the case paid his firm $19.25 million.


entertainment contracts
artist management agreement
Posted by katewilliams | Wednesday, April 24 2013 at 3:51AM ET
I am not related to any law courses but I want to know what is laws all about. I am interested with it. Its kinda challenging in a law firm.
real estate marketing
Posted by angel20 | Thursday, August 15 2013 at 1:31AM ET
By subtracting a customer's largest daily charges first, banks increased the speed at which customer accounts went into the red and began incurring overdraft fees. The practice earned the banking industry billions of dollars over a decade. I agree with this one.
white rock bc houses for sale
Posted by jamich | Thursday, August 15 2013 at 9:41PM ET
Money does not make you happier, relationships do. Visit miami real estate on wikidot.
Posted by edongzki | Friday, January 03 2014 at 5:48PM ET
I'd like to peer more posts like this. So nice to discover someone with genuine thoughts on this issue. I am happy to find this article and have a read it about this. This is really great article! I'll definitely be back for updates. That is very interesting, I love reading and I am always searching for informative information like this.

Here, just visit us to soundcloud plays

Thank you so much.
Posted by taeyang | Tuesday, February 11 2014 at 9:47PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.