Key to Saving the Student Loan Market? Hint: It's Not Banks

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

WASHINGTON The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's push to encourage private lenders to refinance student loan debt is raising questions about whether the agency is focusing on the right target.

A report issued by the agency last week focused solely on private lenders, who represent anywhere between 7% and 15% of student loan originations, while the rest are backed by the federal government. That has left many in the industry arguing that the solution to systemic problems in the student loan market, which echo those of the mortgage market before the financial crisis, lies with the government, not bankers.

"The bigger picture is that private student loans are very much a small part of the market and [private lenders'] loans perform significantly better," said Pace Bradshaw, vice president of congressional affairs at the Consumer Bankers Association.

Many observers argue that the Department of Education should be working on a fix to problems in the student loan market, noting that government loans have default rates that are three times the percentage of private student loans. The Education Department's most recent default report last year showed that the three-year cohort default rate was 13.4% for fiscal year 2009 a rate that would put most banks under an enforcement action. (Private lenders had a roughly 5% default rate.)

Moreover, several private student lenders say they already offer aggressive refinancing plans.

"More than 90% of our customers are making on-time payments, and for our customers experiencing difficulty, we offer customized assistance, including modifications on more than $1 billion in private education loans," said Sallie Mae, the largest student lender, in an emailed response to American Banker. "We are committed to collaborating with the CFPB and helping our private education loan customers succeed."

One reason federal student loans have higher default rates is due to looser underwriting standards designed to make it easier for those with little to no income to secure a loan.

Still, while the Education Department and some lenders have programs to consolidate debt or reduce monthly payments, there is no sweeping plan from the government that helps borrowers refinance their payments if they encounter trouble after the graduate.

"Federal loan consolidation isn't truly a refinance, it's simply a combination of multiple loans into the weighted average interest rate," said Rohit Chopra, the CFPB's student loan ombudsman, in a conference call with reporters last week. "So there is really very limited activity in the refinance space."

Chopra added that he routinely hears from consumers holding six or more student loans that are both federal and private.

"It's difficult to determine whether those loans are federal or private," he said. It's difficult in determining "from a credit report and it's also difficult for the consumer to easily tell in one view what the rates on all their loans are."

As a result of the relative opaqueness of the student loan market, the secondary market has mostly stayed away from securitizing student loans. That makes it even tougher for the private market to take a lead role in refinancing student loans.

Many industry advocates say it's up to Congress to create a stronger refinancing program for federal loans or hold universities to a higher standard when offering federal loans.

"There is a disconnect where lawmakers could reform federal loan programs and make it more accountable," said Rob Lavet , general counsel for Social Finance Inc., one of the few nonbank student refinance lenders.

He suggested a policy in which schools would have to buyback a portion of the student loans if the portfolio hits a certain default threshold. This would also prevent lawmakers from having to create a public fund from taxpayer dollars in order to modify government-backed loans for struggling borrowers.

"Right now, schools are only kicked out of the federal loan program if they have horrific default rates but there's no risk-sharing," Lavet said. "You really wonder about the policy of that."

CFPB officials have hinted that if private student lenders don't take action on their own, the government could attempt to encourage or force refinancings.

"In terms of other authorities, there are certainly other ways that this could be done from a purely private market solution," Chopra said. "But what the comments suggested is that in order to expedite some of that activity, there may be a role for public participation."

Lawmakers are also concerned about the issue. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., introduced a bill last week that would temporarily lower the rate of certain federal loans set to increase July 1.

But that still does not address a disconnect occurring between the Department of Education and the servicers it has contracted to handle federal loans, including approving struggling borrowers into relief programs.

The Education Department declined to comment for this article.

Instead, it provided statistics showing that its federally-held portfolio had a 72% approval rating for 1.3 million applicants who requested an income-based repayment option as of Jan. 31. Their rating was significantly higher than the 58% approval by servicers for the Department for non-federal loans. However, the non-federal loans had a lower number of rejected applicants and far more applicants pending than federal loans with the Department of Education.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

Who's Who in Auto Lending Investigations
As U.S. auto lending has boomed, the industry especially its subprime sector has become a growing target for a slew of prosecutors and regulators. Here are seven government agencies to keep an eye on.

(Image: Bloomberg News)

Comments (1)
I will continue to try and make my point in these posts and hope that one of these days someone much smarter than I will pay attention.
The root of our economic woes lie in the foundation of the conventional practices of how we bank and borrow. Is there a major corporation or bank in the US that operates and manages their finances like a consumer? Do the investment banks of this country earn their billions with the scraps left over at the end of the month after the bills have been paid? Of course not, so why don't consumers start operating their finances like a successful corporation or bank? Do you have any idea what would happen to our nation if consumers were taught how to 'leverage' all of their income against debt as opposed to the minute percentage built into their monthly payment? The default rates on student loans (and mortgages for that matter) would fall to near zero if consumers practiced the same financial techniques used by those of you reading this post. Here's the irony of it all; do banking exectuives manage their personal finances like they manage their banks finances? How many bank executives practice leverage, sweeps and arbitrage within the walls of their own home? I would guess less than 1 percent. I've interviewed 100's of bankers and 99% chase low mortgage rates just like Lunchbox Larry.
Get with it folks; quit looking to our fearless leaders in Washington to fix our economic problems. They ARE NOT the eocnomy, we are the economy so let's take this on ourselves and let them do what they do best...still trying to figure that one out. Let's fix our problems ourselves from the inside out, from the bottom up. Build a stronger consumer and the 'systemic' problems fade and disappear.
Posted by Bill Westrom | Tuesday, May 14 2013 at 12:45PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.