= Subscriber content; or subscribe now to access all American Banker content.

Cryptocurrency Technology Set to Shake Up Correspondent Banking

If banks can't beat cryptocurrencies, they might as well join them.

That seemed to be the consensus at a Tuesday panel on correspondent banking sponsored by The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication.

The multistep correspondent-banking model is being transformed by new entrants touting faster, cheaper services thanks to cryptocurrency technology, panelists said. They urged financial institutions to consider what they can learn from Bitcoin as well as digital currency developers like Ripple Labs and Stellar Development Foundation.

"We really can't close our eyes," said Cheryl Gurz, managing director of the emerging technology segment at Bank of New York Mellon Treasury Services. "If we as traditional correspondent bankers don't keep looking and determining where [cryptocurrency technology] will take us, new entrants will completely take our space."

Bitcoin now gives correspondent banking customers the option of sending money to one another directly, cutting financial institutions out of the process, said Wim Raymaekers, Swift's head of banking markets. Meanwhile, Ripple Labs' distributed-ledger technology allows local banks to move money back and forth while sidestepping automated clearing houses.

Banks need to ask themselves "what is the technology that is enabling Bitcoin currency to move effectively with more visibility and at lower costs," Gurz said. "How can we take that into our current systems and make them more efficient, faster, cheaper and more transparent?"

Protocols like Ripple and Stellar are "getting rid of bilateral legacy processes that banks have been using for years to keep money in their pockets," she continued. Gurz recommended that banks consider "strategic partnerships and alliances" with such firms in order to keep up with customers' evolving expectations.

Some banks might hesitate to adopt distributed-ledger technology because of concerns about running afoul of regulators, some of whom have expressed reservations about cryptocurrency as a potential magnet for money laundering and other criminal activity.

But regulators' concerns may be overblown, said Houman Shadab, a law professor at New York Law School.

"From a compliance perspective, these distributed ledgers provide a database of transactions, and that's a good thing," he said. He pointed out that while Bitcoin was the currency of choice for the now-shuttered online black market Silk Road, "it was evidence based on the electronic paper trail from Bitcoin that was used to find the defendants in that case guilty."

"Once you look past the headlines, it's a great investment from a bank's perspective to go to these technologies," Shadab said. Whether banks adopt Ripple Labs' distributed ledger or use their own, he said, quicker settlements will help them reduce costs.

Banks can use some of those savings to invest in lines of business complementary to correspondent banking like supply-chain finance and trade finance, Shadab said.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(2) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

Comments (2)
It's long overdue that the U.S. Govt and the Banking Industry stop trying to scare the public away from crypto currency by mentioning the Silk Road incident as though it were financial voo doo. The most noticeable fact coming out of Silk Road is that it was a Secret Service Agent and a DEA Agent that robbed Ross W. Ulbricht. They then duped him into giving info so that they could go on and rob and dismantle Mt. Gox, a cryptocoin exchange in Japan. But worse, the Marshals service had the temerity to auction off the coins they robbed in the first place! http://snn.bz/the-bumbling-secret-service/
Posted by SyndicatedNews | Wednesday, April 22 2015 at 5:00AM ET
Stellar really should not be included in the discussion with Ripple. It was a "fork" of the Ripple protocol initiated by a disgruntled former founder, who literally stole the concept and copied it. In the process there have been some problems with their "version" which is not being maintained properly.

It astounds me that Stellar is even being mentioned in the same breath as Bitcoin and Ripple. In any other regulated industry, Stellar would not be able to steal a concept just because they don't get along with their former coworkers and pretend they have something unique to offer.

Stick to Ripple. It is the original innovation, and it is backed by a solid company that is light years ahead of stellar in compliance and adoption.
Posted by BankerBurger | Wednesday, March 04 2015 at 11:06PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.