Banks urge regulators to delay CRA final rule

Barr Gruenberg
Michael Barr, vice chair for supervision at the Federal Reserve, from left, Martin Gruenberg, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Nellie Liang, under secretary for domestic finance at Treasury, during a House Financial Services Committee hearing in March. The American Bankers Association and Bank Policy Institute called on bank regulators to delay finalizing their Community Reinvestment Act rules until the upcoming capital rules are complete and the Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding structure.
Bloomberg News

WASHINGTON — The Bank Policy Institute and the American Bankers Association penned a joint letter Tuesday urging federal bank regulators to delay finalizing the most sweeping revisions to the Community Reinvestment Act — an anti-redlining bill — in decades.

The letter, sent by BPI and ABA to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency suggested regulators should delay any final CRA rule until the agencies' joint Basel III capital rules are finalized. They posited regulators had not considered how the new capital requirements lower the incentive for banks to engage in CRA activities like low down payment mortgages to low-income families.

"The proposed capital rules would reduce incentives to engage in mortgage lending, which is central to the CRA programs of many banks," they said. "Many banks offer low down payment mortgages as a means of meeting the credit needs of low- and moderate-income families."

In addition to asking regulators to pause the CRA rule to accommodate the likely reduction in mortgage lending, the letter also said that a constitutional challenge to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's funding structure should give regulators pause as they move ahead with a final rule. The banking industry has previously expressed opposition to the CRA revamp on the grounds it oversteps congressional authority.

A Texas district court judge last month temporarily barred the CFPB from enforcing its 1071 rule until after the Supreme Court rules on the constitutionality of the CFPB's funding structure sometime next year.

"The banking agencies should delay finalization of the CRA rules until a final determination is made regarding the status of the rules promulgated under Section 1071, which will affect how the agencies administer certain aspects of the CRA rules," the banking groups said. 

While the necessity for a CRA update is widely acknowledged, the banking industry has expressed louder opposition as new Basel III endgame requirements and post-banking crisis reforms coincide with the new CRA standards.

In a comment letter in August, 2022 the Bank Policy Institute said the agencies' joint proposed rule exceeded statutory mandate, added needless complexity and broad application and was overly punitive in its application toward banks. Another major trade group, the American Bankers Association, made similar claims in an August comment letter, saying the proposal missed the mark. ABA said they were concerned that significant numbers of banks would need to invest more in their retail lending departments to pass retail lending examinations under the new rule.

The Community Reinvestment Act was passed in 1977 to bar banks from accepting deposits from lower-income communities without making commensurate levels of loans to those communities — a problem for many communities of color in the first years since explicit racial discrimination in lending was outlawed. The law requires banks to make loans to low- and moderate- income borrowers in the institution's "assessment area," defined as areas where the bank has its headquarters, branches or deposit-taking ATMs.

Banks are assessed for compliance at least every five years by their primary regulator. Banks are graded in three areas: lending, investment and service, weighted as 50%, 25% and 25% of the examination respectively. Banks are then assigned a rating of "outstanding," "satisfactory," "needs to improve" or "noncompliant" based on their performance.

If a bank is deemed to have less than a "satisfactory" rating, then it may not merge with or acquire another banking institution or modify its charter until it achieves compliance. But critics have argued that most banks receive either an outstanding or satisfactory rating, meaning that virtually no banks face the regulatory burdens that the CRA can impose.

Former Comptroller of the Currency Joseph Otting sought to reform the implementation of the CRA during the Trump administration, but community advocates argued that his reforms were too favorable to banks and would yield little additional investment in the communities that need it the most. Bank regulators issued their revised proposal last year. 
— John Heltman contributed to this report

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Regulation and compliance Politics and policy CRA
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER