The U.S. Supreme Court, reversing the South Carolina Supreme Court, said Monday that a landowner was entitled to compensation if environmental regulation prevented him from developing his land.

The decision is "absolutely excellent" from a lenders' perspective said Robert O. Wienke, a Chicago banking and environmental lawyer. The lower court's ruling had threatened to force banks to consider real estate collateral in sensitive zones "worthless until a building permit is issued."

Subscribe Now

Access to authoritative analysis and perspective and our data-driven report series.

14-Day Free Trial

No credit card required. Complete access to articles, breaking news and industry data.