With the economy showing signs of recovery, Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke on Wednesday gave more clues as to how the central bank will return to normal and made clear that financial institutions are central to his plans.
One of the biggest challenges facing the Fed is figuring out how to grapple with the trillions in cash it has dumped into financial markets since 2007 to fight the financial crisis. If the Fed is to avoid inflation, it must find a way to sop up that cash. Given how much is out there, Bernanke said, the central bank's traditional tool – raising the federal funds rate – may not be enough, noted American Banker, an affiliate of Credit Union Journal.
“As a result of the very large volume of reserves in the banking system, the level of activity and liquidity in the federal funds market has declined considerably, raising the possibility that the federal funds rate could for a time become a less reliable indicator than usual,” he said in written testimony that was to have been delivered to a House Financial Services Committee hearing Wednesday before a snowstorm canceled it.
Bernanke is turning to the rate the Fed pays for reserves that financial institutions deposit in the central bank – currently 0.25% – as an “alternative short-term interest rate.”
“It is possible that the Federal Reserve could for a time use the interest paid on reserves, in combination with targets for reserve quantities, as a guide to its policy stance,” Bernanke said.
Congress gave the Fed authority to pay interest on reserves in October 2008, and banks had $1.1 trillion on deposit in the central bank on Feb. 3. Raising the rate the Fed pays on reserves would encourage banks to park more of their money with the central bank, achieving Bernanke's goal of taking money out of the marketplace.
Bernanke is unlikely to raise rates on reserves soon, but when he does, observers said, the increase must be decisive.
“They will have to be very careful what interest they pay,” Rajeev Dhawan, the director of the Economic Forecasting Center at Georgia State University's J. Mack Robinson College of Business, told American Banker. “If they put the rate below market rates, why would banks leave their money there? They will have to be very aggressive in raising the rates if the economy recovers fast.”
Paying higher interest on reserves could effectively draw money to the Fed that otherwise would have gone into loans. And this could set the Fed on a collision course with other agencies of the government. The Obama administration has consistently chided the banking industry for not making enough loans and has directed $30 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program to community banks to stimulate small-business lending.
“This is the $64,000 question,” Dhawan said. Can Fed officials “insulate themselves from the political pressure?”
But others played down the potential for a clash, especially because the Fed has made it clear it will not clamp down on credit anytime soon. “There's no indication he's getting anywhere near tightening,” Chris Low, the chief economist at First Horizon National Corp.'s FTN Financial, told American Banker.
