BANKTHINK

SEC Must Thoroughly Investigate JPMorgan, Including Its CEO

Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (4)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

Wall Street has grown to celebrate superheroes like Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon for their superior management skills and keen business sense. We have come to praise and applaud risk-takers on the assumption that the markets always know best.

Leaders like Dimon are viewed as possessing special powers. Many believe Dimon, who led JPMorgan Chase out of the financial crisis, is a banking prodigy who could do no wrong. But even Dimon is helpless in the face of reckless behavior by employees like the trader Bruno Iksil, who lost $2 billion and counting for JPMorgan's chief investment office.

"Star traders" like Iksil structure their trades in such a complicated way that the average person could never understand them. We have no way of knowing whether the hedges that the CIO put on actually "hedged" the original position. Such complexity, conveniently, can also serve as a powerful tool to refute public outcry.

The question is: Why create such risk in the first place? Or, more importantly: Why create the type of transactions that require a superman to oversee them?

Since the Volcker Rule is still being finalized, FDIC-insured banking institutions will continue to take on these risks as long as they are allowed or exempted to do so. However, banks should face the same consequences for infractions as the rest of society. The "London Whale" trades created massive disruptions in an already fragile market and, ironically, they have caused unrest and disgust in the hedge fund community – a community that loves unregulated market competition. Why don't we hold banks to their own standards, and stop giving them a pass when they blunder?

The Commodities Futures Trading Commission, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Securities and Exchange Commission have all reportedly opened preliminary investigations into the trading loss. And Dimon will be giving a testimony before the Senate Banking Committee next Wednesday to answer questions about the matter.  But the inquiries must serve as more than window dressing.

On Wednesday, Occupy the SEC will be marching in Manhattan from JPMorgan Chase's downtown office to the SEC, calling for the agency to investigate Dimon himself for possible violation of the disclosure requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (Remember how he brushed off the early reports of the London Whale's outsized bets "a tempest in a teapot"?) We will also recommend that the SEC make a criminal referral to the Department of Justice if it finds evidence of wrongdoing.

Many people are frustrated with the slap-on-the-wrist treatment that Wall Streeters enjoy: random petty criminals are sentenced to hard jail time, but the trader who loses billions of dollars is told not to do that again. The JPMorgan Chase debacle is symptomatic of a broken regulatory system.

Many of these financial superheroes who wreaked havoc have not been prosecuted; only given large fines at best. What message does this send? Americans would have been well served by giving Wall Street its day in court. The SEC has to uphold its foundational principles: public companies offering securities to investors must tell the truth about their business, the securities, and the risks involved in investing; and people who sell and trade securities must treat investors fairly and honestly, putting their clients'interests first.

It is fairly simple: if SEC officials find that a company has done wrong it has the power to investigate, issue civil penalties, and refer the case to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. As many financial experts and white-collar crime lawyers have said, the SEC has not fully utilized its authority, as demonstrated by the treatment of Lehman Brothers' Dick Fuld. Will MF Global's Jon Corzine skate too?

The function of a financial institution is not merely to manage risk, but to act primarily as the steward of society's assets and smart allocation of capital. We hope that the SEC and the other regulators will help re-examine the priorities of too-big-to-fail financial institutions.

Finally, the current culture corrodes and disrupts sound business practices and stunts the rehabilitation of our financial system. The SEC is an imperfect vehicle (as evidenced by its lackluster approach to its duties leading up and during the financial crisis) but it's the only vehicle we have. If they don't do their job, who will?

Elizabeth Friedrich is a member of Occupy the SEC, a subgroup of the Occupy Wall Street movement. She works as a program associate at the Federation for Community Development Credit Unions and a consultant with ValueSpark Capital, a social venture fund based in New Orleans. Twitter @ekfriedrich

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(4) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

Who's Who in Auto Lending Investigations
As U.S. auto lending has boomed, the industry especially its subprime sector has become a growing target for a slew of prosecutors and regulators. Here are seven government agencies to keep an eye on.

(Image: Bloomberg News)

Comments (4)
Criminalizing bad business decisions - even multi-billion dollar decisions - is a criminally stupid position.
Posted by jvan | Wednesday, June 06 2012 at 8:43AM ET
I don't pay big bucks for a subscription to a media outlet that publishes this kind of nonsense, by an "Occupy Wall Street" outfit, no less. Cut it out, American Banker, or start looking for new subscribers!
Posted by dvanhoos | Thursday, June 07 2012 at 6:59AM ET
Hello, I serve on a Corporate Governance/Shareholder Rights committee at a professional association whose many members team the wallstreet and asset management community. There is no question what has happened in the financial system is an inside job, however the decision maker level is above Dimon and Blankfien's heads who conveniently are in place and somewhat are foils for problems the ISDA banking cartel and its lobbyists are responsible for as well as the top of the 1% here and the royals abroad which control those national champions and are to suit the german dominated G20 Transatlantic Agreements. Under these agreements, 1. the US to comply is to have no net new job growth, 2. to de-industrialize to suit the germans where we would not be export and industrial competitors to it, 3. 'free' trade would offshore production from which the negative ripple effect would contribute to deindustrializing and create contraction for no net new job growth aka 'jobless" recoveries 4. for our economy to be crippled, weakened, with the financial crisis contributing a fair amount to that end...

the narrow mindedness and insults of jvan and dvanhoos remind me of wallstreet maggotry that were a part of the problem but not part of the solution only they dont have the guts to say to your face in their flimsy attitudes they resent you or your opinion. it's done behind closed doors or using code names and words, but the financial heist is just the full blown picture of what jvan and dvanhoos produce. these 2 above probably the same person... even perpy.

By the Grace of God - At least OWS convenes and over time puts forward opinion and solution to the issues rather than think there should be censorship with regard to observation about C-Suite behaviors that are probably going to bring on shareholder and torte lawsuit or perhaps lawsuits that will arise because of fraud,not only agency abuse and self dealing that JPMC and the other big ISDA cartel players are guilty of having perpetrated.

Much needs to be addressed. Having people like Jamie Dimon or Greenspan, etc in place have jvan and dvanhoos working for them, 'watching' their back....and contributing to making wallstreet a co-opted operating environment which counts on chummie, ineffective and flimsy practices and too clever by a half sollutions or on on purpose making risk management look important, but it's only so that the IT and RM systems can tell management what the fair valuing of the OTC derivatives contraction will yield in gamed unrealized non cash gains in the income statement. The OTC derivs contracting has been a huge gravy train that virtually no one wants to condemn for the agency self dealing and financial statement inflating and gaming that they've been.

many people feed from that corrupt trough. So it's a third rail or made a third rail for anyone who questions what's going on and decisions made.
Posted by Psorasam | Thursday, June 07 2012 at 12:24PM ET
@jvan
Its not criminalising bad business decisions, its taking action when someone wilfully risks other people's pensions. You stake capital knowing that if things turn out, you get to accumulate a disproportionate cut, and when it eventually all turns sour, you walk away with your "winnings", leaving other's financial destruction behind. That is criminal. We just need the sanctions to be applied.
@dvanhoos
Clearly you should stick with Fox News and save your "big bucks" subscription. You don't need journalism, just your prejudices confirmed and what you know re-played. Save your money mate this publication is obviously not for you.
Posted by Peter Harris | Sunday, June 10 2012 at 9:18PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.