= Subscriber content; or subscribe now to access all American Banker content.

Should Banks Disclose the Fees They Don't Charge?

A recent report by Pew Charitable Trusts on banks' overdraft penalty disclosures underscored the old adage, "you know what happens when you assume…" 

Suffice to say that unintended consequences result.

The Pew study compared the fee disclosures of the 12 largest banks. Five of those banks – Wells Fargo (WFC), Citigroup (C), HSBC Finance (HTB), Regions Finance (RF) and Capital One (COF) – provided no information about extended overdraft fees, either in writing or on their websites. So Pew put them in the hall-of-shame "least available" category for that type of fee. (Extended overdraft penalty fees are incurred when an account is overdrawn for a certain period of time, such as five days.)

Logical, right? Except that the reason those five banks "failed" to disclose extended overdraft fees is they didn't charge them in the first place. I know because I called them all to check. Pew hadn't.

Susan K. Weinstock, the director of Pew's Safe Checking in the Electronic Age project, told me that if consumers cannot find fee information easily, banks are not making the proper disclosures.

"We are like the uber-consumer who is looking for the best deal on a checking account. If I go online and read the terms and fees, it's very hard to do because there are gaps in the information," says Weinstock. "If you couldn't find out that there is no fee charged, then there's really no way to know."

Weinstock has urged banks to adopt a uniform disclosure box similar to a nutrition label that would allow for easy comparison of checking account offerings and fees.

So far seven banks and credit unions including JPMorgan Chase (JPM), TD Bank Group (TD) and Inland Bank and Trust (IRC) have adopted Pew's model disclosure form for checking accounts.

Bank of America (BAC) and Citigroup (NYSE:C) have committed to adopting the disclosure form in the next few months, Weinstock says.

Given the industry's rising compliance burden, it may seem like an inopportune time to ask banks to start detailing what they are not doing.

But if the savvy researchers at a think tank can succumb to a fallacy that makes a bank look more devious than it really is, so might the average customer.

Kate Berry is a reporter covering consumer finance for American Banker. The views expressed are her own.


(1) Comment



Comments (1)
Bankers can avoid a lot of grief by complying with voluntary uniform disclosures. It will give customers a sense they're being treated fairly and can comparison shop for services following an era when 'gotcha' fees gave many banks a bad name. It will also give regulators fewer excuses to meddle with the business and plaintiff lawyers fewer claims over which to sue. Neil Weinberg, Editor in Chief, American Banker
Posted by Neil Weinberg | Friday, June 15 2012 at 2:08PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.