Quantcast
BANKTHINK
Partner Insights

Mortgage Settlement Is Beating Goals, Proving Doubters Wrong

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

Late last month, Joseph A. Smith, Jr., the independent monitor of the National Mortgage Settlement, issued his third progress report. The results show that in its first 10 months, the settlement outperformed targets, proving the critics wrong.

In the three main categories of homeowner benefits—first lien reduction, second lien reduction, and short sales—the benefits far exceeded our expectations. Overall we estimated homeowner benefits of $34 billion within 36 months. We have realized $45.8 billion in the first 10 months, helping 554,389 homeowners.

Our first priority was principal reduction. The agreement required at least $5.1 billion in first-lien principal reduction. In 10 months, more than double that—$10.9 billion—has been achieved. The agreement requires $17 billion in total credits for homeowner benefits. Principal reduction alone could approach that amount.

Some voiced opposition to principal reduction because they thought that once it began in a significant way, many who could pay their mortgages would default, endangering the whole market. That has simply not happened. Rather, as a result of principal reduction, more people are staying in their homes and are making sustainable payments.

Our hope and plan was that the settlement would show principal reduction works and that it would act as a catalyst for the use of writedowns in other loan modifications. That is now occurring. For example, about three-quarters of eligible underwater homeowners entering the Home Affordable Modification Program in 2012 received some form of principal reduction. 

There has also been a surge in the numbers of short sales—$19 billion worth. This is a good thing. Short sales are initiated by homeowners, not the banks, and are a better alternative to foreclosure. They allow homeowners the freedom to move in situations that may involve taking a job elsewhere or changing family needs. My office previously received many complaints from borrowers seeking short sales who could not get them. Those complaints are now minimal.

With short sales, homeowners do not owe the deficiency and are given a fresh start without debt collectors hounding them for years to come. Neighborhoods are spared the empty homes and home value losses associated with foreclosures. The housing market is better off. Investors lose less money than they would in a foreclosure. It is likely that the servicers won't need credit from short sales to fulfill their $17 billion consumer relief requirements.

Second lien reductions are also far beyond expectations at $11.6 billion. Second lien reductions help homeowners stay in their homes and ensure an element of fairness for the holders of the first lien. It is likely that there will be enough first and second lien reductions to satisfy the homeowner benefits requirements under the settlement's consumer relief credit structure.

The settlement is accomplishing the objectives that we had set in shaping this joint state-federal civil law enforcement effort. It is providing substantial relief to borrowers that they would not have received otherwise. It is keeping people in their homes, it's helping our communities, and it's assisting in the housing market recovery.

Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller was the lead state attorney general in the joint state-federal $25 billion national mortgage settlement.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

'I Want a Tom O'Brien Action Figure Doll': Comments of the Week

American Banker readers share their views on the most pressing banking topics of the week. Comments are excerpted from reader response sections of AmericanBanker.com articles and from our social media platforms.

(Image: Bloomberg News)

Comments (1)
Short sales are not, as a rule, initiated by homeowners. Home buyers, yes, but there are not many owners who are jumping at the "opportunity" to lose all of their equity. In our case, a buyer waited until 72 hours before the foreclosure hearing to extend an offer (it was the first, and only offer we received in over 16 months). The bill collectors do call - it just changes the order on the dance card, not the damage done.

See http://www.desolationpress.com/essays/indreview.html for a blow by blow account of one *former* homeowner's story.
Posted by teknoscribe | Friday, March 08 2013 at 10:03PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.