This year marks the hundredth anniversary of the Federal Reserve Act, often described as the most important financial law in U.S. history. This year also is the 80th anniversary of the Glass-Steagall Act, which President Franklin Roosevelt called "the second most important banking legislation enacted in the history of our country."
One member of Congress, Carter Glass, was the principal author of both the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 and the Glass-Steagall Act 20 years later. This anniversary year provides the opportunity to review Glass's remarkable achievements and their relevance today.
At the start of the twentieth century the United States lacked a public authority that could respond to economic emergencies. During the Panic of 1907, rescues of commercial banks, trust companies, securities firms, the New York Stock Exchange, and New York City had to be organized by a private individual, J. P. Morgan. There was widespread recognition that the nation needed a formal body to deal with future financial panics. Republican Senator Nelson Aldrich proposed legislation that would create a powerful state bank based on the German model. The Aldrich plan was defeated by Democrats, Progressives, and many Republicans, who opposed a strong central bank controlled by Wall Street.
In 1910 the Democrats gained control of the House and appointed Carter Glass, a Congressman from Virginia, to head a subcommittee to prepare legislation. Glass drafted a bill that would create a decentralized system with twelve regional Federal Reserve Banks overseen by a Federal Reserve Board in Washington. The bill was opposed by conservative Republicans who wanted a strong central bank and by agrarians who saw Glass's bill as a disguised version of the Aldrich Plan. Glass persevered in both the House and Senate, striving to obtain agreement on reasonable legislation, while compromising as necessary. His bill, the Federal Reserve Act, was signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson on Dec. 22, 1913. Glass subsequently was honored as the "father of the Federal Reserve System" in a ceremony at the Federal Reserve Building in Washington.
In the 1920s Glass, by then a Senator, became concerned that commercial banks were fueling stock speculation by making loans to brokers. Even worse, Federal Reserve Banks were extending loans to commercial banks in their districts; these banks then re-lent the funds to brokers. Glass believed that unless the Federal Reserve Board used its general authority to curb these activities, a crash was inevitable.
Glass's warnings were largely ignored. Indeed, Glass was ridiculed. The stock market crashed in October of 1929.
In a highly unusual move, the Senate Banking Committee, controlled by Republicans, appointed a subcommittee chaired by Glass, a Democrat, to prepare legislation. The experience of the 1920s demonstrated that legislation granting only general authority to regulators was unlikely to work. "There is no lonelier man," the historian Frederick Lewis Allen observed, "than a government official who finds himself confronting…plausible arguments for…lax administration." Justice Louis D. Brandeis warned, "Remember the inevitable ineffectiveness of regulation."
So Glass drafted legislation that laid down precise statutory prohibitions (e.g., banks and companies affiliated with banks cannot underwrite securities; securities firms cannot accept deposits) and that gave clear directions to regulators (e.g. Federal Reserve Banks must keep informed of bank loans to determine whether they are being used for speculation). Glass met violent opposition from Wall Street and its allies in Congress. He received no assistance from President Herbert Hoover and little help from his successor Franklin Roosevelt.
Citbank and Bank of America would have never have become the money-sucking monsters they are if Glass-Steagall weren't first weakened under the Reagan administration and killed off during the Clinton administration. No, this took decades of constant work first to line up economists and academics, then legislators and regulators to do the dirty deed.
Banks can barely survive if they stick to banking. Add those other businesses, and management fails. Look at the litany of unpunished activity: LIBOR manipulation, RMBS fraud, money laundering, foreclosure fraud, violations of FCPA. There are no statutes that banks don't violate with impunity, thanks to the trillions they control courtesy of the murder of Glass-Steagall.
Glass for many years held the view that the banking and securities business should be separate from one another, and the Crash of 29 and ensuing years of bank failures presented him with just the "problem" his "solution" was searching for.
The fact is, however, that of the nearly 9000 banks that failed 1930-33(well over a third of all banks)few were involved in securities activities or had securities affiliates.
No one can argue that clear laws and strong vigilant regulators are needed over ALL financial activities, but separation of banks and securities firms did nothing for the thousands of small community based banks which failed, much less their customers.
These changes to the paradigm of emplacement justify a corporate wide reevaluation of retention policies and strategies. The HR Department should be on the forefront of changing the business's attitude toward employees from one of "us against them" to one of employee empowerment and partnership.
The managers who will excel at retaining valuable, productive and trained employees will be those who see the employment relationship as a contract in which management has responsibilities to employees to assure their continued growth and success just as the employee must pull his weight in the company.agen sbobet | seo india A partnership approach to management will go a long way toward improving the company's retention profile which will benefit the business in a multitude of ways.