B of A Signs HUD Pact Over Mortgage Abuse

Print
Email
Reprints
Comments (25)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

The Department of Housing and Urban Development has reached a settlement with Bank of America that releases the company from liability for failing to adequately provide alternatives to foreclosure on 57,000 delinquent government-insured mortgages.

The agreement, a draft of which was obtained by American Banker, was previously undisclosed. It has been forged on a separate but parallel track from continuing settlement talks between Bank of America, state attorneys general and other regulators over alleged mortgage origination and servicing failures.

B of A's pact with HUD requires it to waive a minimum of $10 million in unpaid mortgage payments and vet each of the 57,000 delinquent borrowers for a possible loan modification, short sale or other foreclosure alternative.

"Our total costs for the program will be multiples of that" $10 million minimum, B of A spokesman Dan Frahm said. The deal calls for measures to "ensure these customers have every opportunity to stay in their homes," he added.

After such outreach, the settlement paves the way for B of A to foreclose on homes that borrowers could not afford even after a mortgage modification and those that have been left vacant by owners.

In forging the agreement, HUD decided to forgo steep monetary damages or admissions of error from the bank.

Instead, it pushed for the lender to implement steps that in most cases it was supposed to have already taken under the terms of its FHA-guaranteed loans, with the apparent aim of minimizing foreclosures and related insurance claims.

"We took the borrowers into account first," said HUD general counsel Helen Kanovsky. "We think that that's really the best thing for the FHA [insurance] fund as well."

The agreement is HUD's first involving settlement of claims in which a servicer failed to offer loss mitigation to borrowers. It does not, however, prevent HUD from seeking damages from B of A for unrelated origination and servicing failures.

"We fought for as narrow a [legal] release as possible and as much money as possible," Kanovsky said.

Under HUD's standard terms, borrowers must be less than 12 months delinquent to qualify for loan modifications. With the B of A settlement, the minimum of $10 million the bank agreed to pay will go to covering past-due arrearages and giving borrowers who are more than a year behind the possibility of qualifying for foreclosure alternatives.

The agreement was signed July 11 by B of A senior vice president Robert Gaither, who directed queries to a company spokesman.

All of the 57,000 borrowers covered by the agreement are 12 to 24 months delinquent. They account for only 4% of the total 1.5 million FHA loans that B of A services but a substantial portion of the company's seriously delinquent loans. B of A holds $19.8 billion in FHA-insured loans that are 90 days or more delinquent, and another $3.1 billion in FHA loans 31 to 89 days delinquent, the bank said in its second-quarter earnings release.

Under its terms with HUD, B of A will have to pay an independent monitor to review its modification work and report to HUD. It is also obligated to seek borrowers through database searches, letters, phone queries and visits to properties. Borrowers who fail to qualify for loan modifications, will receive from B of A $4,000 for a short sale and $7,500 for a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure.

The deal reflects the high levels of financial uncertainty surrounding such negotiations. In May, B of A agreed to pay $20 million, or double the minimum for the latest settlement, for improperly foreclosing on a relatively few 160 homes of military service members.

The settlement is "not a lot of money for the potential losses that the federal government may have to make good on," said Diane Thompson, an attorney for the National Consumer Law Center.

The minimum $10 million payment of borrowers' arrearages is unlikely to defray the FHA's losses on foreclosures, she said.

But if Bank of America is "able to identify the loans, and if people are still in the homes, and if they waive payments over past 12 months, then that's more valuable than a big fine for Bank of America," Thompson said. "But there are a lot of ifs there."

The largest banks hold billions of dollars of delinquent FHA loans on their balance sheets for which they have not yet filed claims. This may be because of concerns that they may have violated stringent HUD servicer requirements and could be held liable for treble damages related to false claims. One sticking point in settling such claims is that the FHA requires all servicers to have employees conduct face-to-face interviews with FHA borrowers once they become 60 days delinquent, a procedure most servicers either did not undertake or cannot document.

As part of the deal HUD has also agreed to pay any mortgage insurance claims and waive any pending administrative actions against B of A, its officers, directors or employees "in connection with servicing or loss mitigation deficiencies." The only exclusion is for allegations involving improper transfers of titles.

B of A also has agreed not to claim expenses on any FHA insurance claims for taxes, liens or property preservation incurred from November 2010 through July 2011.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(25) Comments

SEE MORE IN

Who's Who in Auto Lending Investigations
As U.S. auto lending has boomed, the industry especially its subprime sector has become a growing target for a slew of prosecutors and regulators. Here are seven government agencies to keep an eye on.

(Image: Bloomberg News)

Comments (25)
After two and a half years battling B of A to get a HAMP modification and the last six months trying to keep B of A from foreclosing on us even after we had recieved the modification, I know a bit about how B of A works. The first thing about this settlement that is ridiculous is that Brian Moynihan carrys $10,000,000.00 around in his wallet. This amount is not even going to be noticed by B of A. The second, and this is where my years of experience with B of A comes in, is that I can say without a bit of hesitation that B of A will simply ignore all the other settlement requirements. There is no enforcement agency that is going to make B of A comply. If there were such an agency, B of A would have been forced to comply with already existing laws that would have kept all of us from where we are today.
Posted by terry W | Thursday, August 04 2011 at 4:29PM ET
It is beyond me how fraud transforms into "abuse" when it comes to the financial industry. When corporations commit crimes their punishment is equivalent to getting a traffic ticket. Repeat offenders never get seriously punished. This two-tiered system of justice needs to be reformed. Where else in society can someone repeatedly commit crimes, never have to be personally accountable, and have the luxury of negotiating their own settlement?
Posted by Peter G | Thursday, August 04 2011 at 4:40PM ET
It is amazing how the banks are let off the hook. They are just miserable with excess fees to feed the CEO bonus. The fine is pocket money and I wonder if it is more or less than the CEO bonus.
Posted by tom d | Thursday, August 04 2011 at 4:40PM ET
$10M is less than pennies to bankers. $10B would be too little. The crimes committed by bankers is so egregious it is hard to put a price tag on it. We need to nationalize the top 5 big banks and now!
Posted by Janet W | Thursday, August 04 2011 at 5:01PM ET
This is OUTRAGEOUS.
Bank of America continues to filed backdated assignments of mortgages - this is absolutely frigging OUTRAGEOUS.
Posted by Liz C | Thursday, August 04 2011 at 5:27PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.