Quantcast
JAN 9, 2012 1:17pm ET

Web Seminars

Shut the Front Door to Fraud
June 14, 2012
Breaking the Banks: Declining Performance in the Reputation Economy
June 21, 2012
The New Subprime Definition: Who is subprime now? How much subprime is in your portfolio?
June 27, 2012

Santorum Runs from Record on Fannie, Freddie Housing Goals

Print
Reprints
Email

WASHINGTON — In his eight years on the Senate Banking Committee, Rick Santorum was an infrequent presence at committee hearings, even though his office was located on the same floor of the Dirksen office building as the committee's hearing room.

But there was one issue where the Pennsylvania Republican sought to play a leading role. Santorum, despite his reputation as a conservative stalwart, had a keen interest in providing disadvantaged families greater access to affordable housing.

In 2005, when Banking Committee Republicans were trying to tighten the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Santorum pushed to include language in the legislation that would strengthen their affordable-housing goals.

"We're very concerned about making sure that we do things in working with this legislation to improve the access to affordable housing," Santorum said during a July 28, 2005 hearing on the Senate bill.

He added that he wanted to orient Fannie and Freddie "toward taking a more active role in creating housing opportunities for low and moderate income families."

At the time, those words were largely uncontroversial, and Republicans on the Banking Committee agreed to adopt Santorum's amendment, voting down a Democratic alternative that would have imposed stricter affordable-housing requirements on Fannie and Freddie.

But six and a half years later, Santorum's record has a different tint. Rival GOP presidential candidates have embraced a theory that blames government policies aimed at expanding access to homeownerhip for the 2008 financial crisis.

Fannie and Freddie are at the center of this narrative, as are congressional Democrats. Conservatives who espouse the theory argue that near the height of the housing bubble in 2005, the two government-sponsored mortgage giants should have been far less oriented toward providing affordable housing - not more so, as Santorum was advocating.

During a November presidential debate, Mitt Romney argued: "The reason we have the housing crises we have is that the federal government played too heavy a role in our markets. The federal government came in with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and Barney Frank and Chris Dodd told banks they had to give loans to people who couldn't afford to pay them back."

Santorum, whose presidential campaign got a boost last week from a close second-place finish in Iowa, has not disputed the theory that federal policies aimed at expanding home ownership to unqualified buyers were a major cause of the financial crisis.

In fact, he has suggested that he agrees with it — placing blame on Democrats without acknowledging his own history of seeking to use Fannie and Freddie to expand access to affordable housing.

In a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed article from May 2010, Santorum seemingly attributed the financial crisis to Fannie, Freddie, and the affordable-housing goals of Democrats.

"In the 1990s, the Clinton administration pushed the mortgage giants to take on more subprime debt — and therefore risk — to accomplish Democrats' affordable-housing goals," Santorum wrote. "As Fannie and Freddie grew in size and risk profile, I and some of my Republican colleagues attempted to restrict their growth and reform them. Democrats opposed us, and they prevailed until it was too late."

Santorum's presidential campaign did not respond to two requests for comment for this article.

To understand why, during Santorum's days as a senator, he embraced the idea of expanding affordable housing, it helps to remember that at the time he portrayed himself as a "compassionate conservative."

That label — which has fallen out of favor among Republican politicians — was popularized by George W. Bush during the 2000 presidential campaign.

Comments (2)
However, noble the intentions, when loans are handed out based on the desire to do good rather than make money, the result tends to be a mountain of bad debt. Now that the political winds have shifted, Santorum is doing the same. But hey, he's a pol. That's what he gets paid to do. Neil Weinberg, Editor in Chief, American Banker.
Posted by Neil W | Monday, January 09 2012 at 3:14PM ET
The key point is this passage: "without acknowledging his own history of seeking to use Fannie and Freddie to expand access to affordable housing." Yes, pols are pols, and yes Sen. D'Amato was a Republican who would lean left and crusade against ATM fees at election time, and yes people of all stripes change their minds, esp. as they age ... but, if you switch sides and make a political point of the issue, you should probably be transparent about your conversion. Voters can decide whether it's a sincere change or the dreaded flip-flop. -- Dean Anason, Assistant Managing Editor, American Banker.
Posted by Dean A | Monday, January 09 2012 at 6:41PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.