= Subscriber content; or subscribe now to access all American Banker content.

Experian Sued for Alleged Data Errors

Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood's office sued credit reporting giant Experian Information Solutions, alleging errors in the company's data and regular violations of consumer protection laws.

The lawsuit accuses Experian of knowingly including mistake-riddled data in the credit files of millions of Americans, jeopardizing their ability to obtain loans, employment-related background checks and sensitive government security clearances. The complaint states that Experian has even wrongly reported that consumers are on a federal terrorism watch list.

The lawsuit was filed in a Biloxi, Miss. state courthouse and transferred to Mississippi federal court late last week.

The case stands out as the first major legal action by a state against a credit bureau in recent years, however, and its litigation may pressure other states and federal agencies to take public action. Much of Mississippi's case appears to be rooted in documents obtained directly from Experian.

Experian officials have stated to investors that, to the best of its knowledge, it complies with data protection requirements. However, the company warned that, "We might fail to comply with international, federal, regional, provincial, state or other jurisdictional regulations, due to their complexity, frequent changes or inconsistent application and interpretation."

Earlier this year, Experian warned investors that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and its British counterpart are regulatory agencies responsible for protecting consumers and said, "It remains uncertain how these bodies may affect our credit and consumer business processes and business models in the future."

"Experian has turned its failures to maintain accurate credit reports and its refusal to investigate consumer disputes into a business opportunity," Hood, a Democrat, said in a statement.

The lawsuit states that Experian provides no logical way for consumers to correct erroneous blemishes affecting their credit. When consumers file a dispute, Experian reflexively finds in favor of the bank or debt collector that reported the debt, Mississippi officials said. When consumers call to complain, the lawsuit said Experian employees attempt to sell consumers "credit monitoring products of questionable value."

Experian's alleged misconduct has hurt Mississippi consumers, the lawsuit said, because of the company's alleged failure to maintain reasonable procedures to verify credit information and correct mistakes - a violation of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act.

At Experian's request, examples of allegedly inappropriate business practices were censored in the public court filing because Experian considers them a trade secret.


(2) Comments



Comments (2)
And further, why the CFPB is even in existence. It was reported by ICBA that the banking industry has been hit with some 9,800 regulations since 2007. That is some 1,400 per year, 117 per month and over 5 per day. It is also reported that there are about 50 pages of information for each regulation thus to keep current it would require reading some 250 pages every working day. THIS IS RIDICULOUS.
Posted by Alfred Kreps | Wednesday, June 18 2014 at 12:12PM ET
While the CFPB drags its feet on clamping down on the punishing effects these credit bureaus have on consumers, it is once again a state authority that is taking action. Hard to understand why the CFPB would be launching into new areas such as mobile banking - where there is no evidence that consumers are being hurt - without first addressing the widespread and well-documented errors in credit reports that plague consumers right now.
Posted by jim_wells | Tuesday, June 17 2014 at 5:12PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.