BBVA's Simple Purchase Reflects Mobile Banking's Sizzle

Print
Email
Reprints
Comment (1)
Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Google+

Spanish bank BBVA has long been known as a tech-savvy leader in digital banking. Its U.S. subsidiary, BBVA Compass, boasts what is widely regarded as some of the best-designed mobile banking apps in the country. So on first blush, the giant Spanish bank's Feb. 20 announcement that it's buying online banking company Simple puzzled a few of us.

BBVA is buying Portland-based Simple for $117 million. The two companies say Simple will continue to operate independently alongside BBVA's other U.S. operations. Simple founder and CEO Joshua Reich will continue in his role, and the company's board of directors will carry on independently.

Why did the $820 billion-asset bank make this sizable investment in an area in which it was far from weak?

The answer is not so Simple.

BBVA appears to see several appealing features in Simple, but undoubtedly the key trend driving it is the industry's seismic shift to mobile banking.

BBVA has "leapfrogged the competition in a quest to respond to the needs of the digital consumer," says Jim Marous, senior vice president, corporate development at consulting firm New Control. That, he says holds true "whether BBVA decides to build a separate mobile-first bank, the way Capital One did in the online space with ING, or integrate the functionality of Simple within their current solution."

Francisco Gonzalez, BBVA's chairman and CEO, showed his hand in a recent Financial Times editorial. "Some bankers and analysts think that Google, Facebook, Amazon or the like will not fully enter a highly regulated, low-margin business such as banking," he wrote. "I disagree. What is more, I think banks that are not prepared for such new competitors face certain death."

In terms of preparing for the digital onslaught, Simple provides BBVA with a nationwide, young and digitally savvy customer base, a respected mobile banking platform and a brand that's well known (at least in some circles) for innovation. Collateral benefits include the PR benefit of being perceived as an aggressive investor in digital banking.

Simple's complex history

Simple's (originally BankSimple) journey began in 2009 when Joshua Reich got mad at his bank. When I first met him in February 2011, Reich was a relatively unknown, jeans-clad Brooklyn hipster with a small startup and a vision: to create a digital bank "that doesn't suck." He shared online banking horror stories: the time his bank overdrew his account by processing a batch of bills twice, then his credit card was charged to cover the loan at an annual interest rate of 19%; the surprise he felt when he called up his home lender's mortgage calculator only to find it contained no information on his mortgage.

"It's one thing to say you have a feature, it's another for it to work," he says. "To make it work well is still another thing."

Reich put together a tech team, created a sleek online and mobile banking user interface and set a goal of signing up around 15 banks to use it. Potential bank-partners had to meet three criteria: they had to believe in BankSimple's vision; they had to cede control to BankSimple (no cross-selling of unrelated products on BankSimple's site); and they had to be able to integrate their systems and products with Reich's.

Everything had to be BankSimple-branded. In exchange for the chance to build awareness of their own brands, banks would get a chance via BankSimple to break into a new digital market, akin to the way the ING direct model did it.

Fast-forward three years. Simple has come a long way. It moved to Portland, Ore. (perhaps the one U.S. city hipper than Brooklyn). Its founders generated buzz by working the speaking circuit and pointing out the failings of traditional banks' digital offerings. It joined the ranks of a small club of digital-native banks, sometimes called "neo-banks," that includes Moven, Green Dot's GoBank and American Express's Bluebird.

Then in late 2011, it signed up The Bancorp Bank as a bank partner. It beta-launched Simple the following summer. Its maiden offering included mobile apps for iOS and Android with mobile check deposit and a Goals feature that lets account holders schedule automatic savings. In 2013, it handled $1.7 billion in transactions. Its staff grew to 92.

The deals the company hoped to sign with other banks never materialized. Simple, along with Moven and the other neo-banks, struggled to turn a profit.

"For these companies, the question has long been 'can they really survive on their own?'" says Zilvinas Bareisis, senior analyst within Celent's Banking group. "What is their business model? Can they make enough money to become sustainable? The service is good. The customer experience is amazing. The features are targeted at young, digital-native customers."

The problem for Simple and similar ventures is that they have but one revenue source: interchange fees.

Now that Simple has sold out, it becomes BBVA's challenge to make it profitable. The Spanish bank, which bought Birmingham, Ala.-based Compass Bancshares in early 2007, just before the financial crisis, has faced its own struggle in the U.S. to build brand recognition.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(1) Comment

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

'Dodd-Frank Is Like the TSA': Comments of the Week
American Banker readers share their views on the most pressing banking topics of the week. Comments are excerpted from reader response sections of AmericanBanker.com articles and from our social media platforms.

(Image: iStock)

Comments (1)
Would be interesting to hear what Milman has to offer in terms of innovation that has stemmed from inside of a bank. Without debating the the price paid for Simple, it seems naive to think that a bank could spend a few months and a half a million dollars to replicate Simple, he has clearly never used their product. It is propagating thoughts like this which keeps the banking industry in the stone age, protecting their outdated technology and experience through law instead of value creation. But the most naive thing is the all or nothing approach that banks continue to mistake. Simple has spent years and millions of dollars learning, designing, iterating and testing to get where they are today - the best banking experience on the market. To try and replicate a skin would lose the true value of what BBVA bought - technology, a focus on the customer, and a product people actually care about, and a team that would never, ever work as a salaried employee at a bank. BBVA is a consumer bank ahead of its time. Congratulations to them.
Posted by Fintech_Preneur | Friday, February 28 2014 at 3:20PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.