= Subscriber content; or subscribe now to access all American Banker content.

Banks and the PFM Delusion

In an unpublished survey conducted this fall by Aite Group, a strong majority of credit union executives (75 percent of the 500 polled) indicated that online personal financial management tools for customers was a must-have investment either by this year or next.

But the enthusiasm shown by these credit union leaders-and by the bankers who have flocked to PFM providers like Yodlee, Geezeo and Intuit's FinanceWorks-has thus far not been matched by a similar response from customers.

This spring, research firm Celent reported that only 4 percent of online banking customers at the top 50 banks are active PFM users. And in a September survey of more than 1,100 U.S. consumers, Aite found that only 27 percent use PFM from any host, be it their own institution or a third-party site like Mint.com.

The problem, Aite research analyst Ron Shevlin says, is not a lack of promotion by banks to spark their customers' interest. Instead, it's a lack of recognition in the industry of what users want PFM to do for them.

"Why so few consumers use this tool is that so few are engaged or active in the management of their financial life," says Shevlin. "Eighty percent of people don't do budgeting. These are the people who aren't the Quicken junkies."

Shevlin is a frequent critic of banks' approach to PFM. At a September National Consumers League online panel with representatives of Mint.com, JPMorgan Chase and the U.S. Treasury Department, Shevlin pointed out 45 minutes into the discussion that none of them agreed on what aspects of financial management should be part of PFM offerings.

Are capabilities like budgeting and spending analysis enough? Or will PFM only gain traction when it becomes a factor in financial decision-making, through services such as real-time price comparisons or customized loan-rate appraisals?

Shevlin argued that without a true understanding of consumer needs, the whole premise that current PFM empowers consumers to "gain an understanding" of their fiscal lives is faulty. "I believe we have a PFM delusion problem in the financial services industry," Shevlin said.

Aite's survey shows a definitive lack of consumer interest in PFM: 58 percent have no plans to adopt it. Only 13 percent want their bank or credit union to help them with financial advice tools, and 46 percent don't care whether their institution offers PFM.

But for the small segment of customers who do use PFM, it's often a gateway to deeper relationships. The customers with the most comprehensive use of PFM-monthly spending forecasting, for example, have higher levels of new-account openings and referrals. Even the audience for a bank's social media outlets are almost exclusively those enrolled in PFM, according to Aite's survey.

Simply put, PFM works well to engage some customers, but it's just not useful enough in the ways necessary to attract the masses.

Where banks have missed an opportunity, Shevlin says, is in taking PFM into untapped areas of deep consumer interest. Tools like customized mortgage-rate evaluation technology from Credit Karma or Truaxis' handy tables comparing cell phone or cable TV service costs are options that, if part of a PFM platform, could make service enrollment not only more likely but potentially more profitable.

If banks can drum up enough interest, then perhaps they can offer a menu of PFM services they could charge for.

Some institutions are trying the fee-based model on for size. Portland, Ore.-based Unitus Community Credit Union, which offers a PFM tool called Total Finance on the Geezeo platform, charges $2 a month for a service that it promotes to wealthier customers who are apt to buy more products and financial advisory services. But the program, while robust, is still mainly about budget planning and expenditure tracking.

Geezeo's president and co-founder, Pete Glyman, says the company already is gearing up for next-generation PFM tools like mobile-based price comparisons or merchant-based rewards, delivered through spending data analysis that banks can compile from consumer activity.

"Rewards, merchant-specific information, offers, all of these things are building blocks," Glyman says. "But ultimately it's the data, it's the information provided through our system, that's going to empower a lot of these other value-added solutions."

Shevlin, too, believes PFM eventually will encompass features like rewards delivery, fraud protection and tools for smarter shopping, all of which can help banks push PFM program costs onto merchants. But that probably would require PFM providers to bring third-party developers onto their platforms, since it may be cost-prohibitive to develop a wide-ranging menu on their own. A model here is Yodlee's FinApp store, for which independent developers can create PFM tools (such as a tax preparation app) that banks can adopt and offer to customers.

To get there, though, banks first have to make a strategic shift in how they target PFM. Shevlin says the research shows that banks are too narrow in their focus in appealing only to a small segment.

"If you're looking to improve the relationship with the other 80 percent, then you've got to rethink what's going to be offered," he says. "It's a decision that banks have to make in terms of what's their strategy for PFM and how they define it in the first place."


(4) Comments



Comments (4)
Great article! I would love to know if the conclusions here are still up-to-date. Id love to contact the author and also the people that left comments, especially frankarauscher, please send email to felipealamos@gmail.com
Posted by fhalamos | Thursday, February 25 2016 at 11:35AM ET
Dear Bankers, Save yourselves lots of big bucks now and listen very carefully to Ron Shevlin before you commit to PFM vendors. And NEVER equate what your few Quicken clients want with what the vast majority of your customers really want and do.
Posted by Lawrence Baxter | Tuesday, November 20 2012 at 2:03PM ET
Interesting article with interesting figures. Totally agree with the points that banks/PFM providers have to rethink what should be offered and how to meet customers real time issues. However, comparing to US customers it seems that European customers are more thirsty to such money management tools as PFM.

According to Bankfutura e-Finance Research's recent market research (can be found at bankfutura.com), about 56% of the Italians said that they would welcome PFM if it is available via their online banking, this number is lower - 47% - for the Germans which is also quite significant. Interestingly, siginificant number of the people are even ready to change their banks for PFM services.
Posted by Otabek Saydikaharov | Monday, November 12 2012 at 11:03AM ET
This is a great article. It also reflects the reality that some major banks are not looking out for their customers because they have not had to do so while they have been able to grow via acquisition. Besides - studies have shown that the public does not TRUST the banks and it may be that many of the top executives are viewed as "financial gangsters".

PFM tools have been around for years and are focused on the 70-80% of customers with most of the "investable" assets AND/OR higher incomes. And those that have most of the "debt" are ignored. Look at all the suits, settlements, penalties, etc that have been levied over the last half decade and you see the destruction and lack of concern by banks for the general public. Look at the Card Act and Dodd-Frank which has tried to reign in some of the avarice.

Now you even have the board of directors at Wells Fargo Bank stating that their payday loans (at 200% interest) are good for their customers while executives at Chase and Citibank say they are bad for their customers. Who would you believe? And Wells touts that they are a "relationship bank". A one-way relationship to make lower middle income customers poorer! Wells Fargo makes an estimated 1000% Return on Equity on their payday loans (you read that correctly).

For true PFM to be accepted and used, it needs to include debt as well as assets and budgets. And it requires TRUST.
Posted by frankarauscher | Friday, November 02 2012 at 12:40PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.