WASHINGTON -
In fact, lobbyists were predicting the bill will die again as it did in each of the last two congresses, because of insistence by the Bush Administration that the regulator have full authority to require Fannie and Freddie to sell some of their huge mortgage holdings. Language included in the House bill would only allow the regulator to do so when issues of safety and soundness arise.
The bill has little for credit unions, except one provision that would create an affordable housing fund similar to the ones required by the FHLBs. But the Fannie and Freddie fund would provide as much as $3 billion to qualified projects, including those involving credit unions, over a five-year period.
The longer the debate goes on over the bill, the less likely it will come to fruition, as the existing regulators for both Fannie, Freddie, and the FHLBs are proving to be up their jobs.









