Bank of America, Barclays and a dozen more banks must face investor claims that they rigged a benchmark used in the sales of interest-rate derivatives and other financial instruments.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan Monday rebuffed the banks' request to throw out antitrust lawsuits accusing the institutions of colluding to set ISDAfix, affecting trillions of dollars of financial instruments. The rate is used to set prices on interest-rate swap transactions, commercial real-estate mortgages and other securities.
An Alaska pension fund and other investors raised "plausible allegations that a conspiracy among the defendants existed," Furman said in a 36-page ruling. He allowed antitrust and breach-of-contract contract claims to proceed to trial, while throwing out other allegations.
Starting in 2009, the banks used electronic chat rooms and other means of private communication to set ISDAfix, typically submitting identical rate quotes, investors said in their suit. They are seeking billions in losses tied to the alleged rate-fixing scheme.
John Yiannacopoulos, a Bank of America spokesman, had no immediate comment on Furman's ruling. Kerrie Cohen, a Barclays spokeswoman, declined to comment.
Investors also named as defendants Deutsche Bank, BNP Paribas, HSBC Holdings, Royal Bank of Scotland Group, Credit Suisse Group, UBS, Goldman Sachs Group, Nomura Holdings, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase.
Representatives of JPMorgan and RBS didn't respond to requests for comment. The other banks declined to comment.
ICAP, which administered and brokered transactions that established the benchmark rate, is also named as a defendant. Guy Taylor, an ICAP spokesman, declined to comment on Monday's ruling.