-
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has filed a lawsuit in federal court against a web of payday lending companies, alleging that they collected money that consumers did not owe and falsely threatened consumers with lawsuits and imprisonment.
August 4 -
Many online small-business lenders worry that future regulations could stymie innovation in this fast-growing industry. But well-designed requirements would simply ensure that online lenders can offer adequate borrower protections without giving up market share.
August 4 -
The former operators of an online payday lending scheme in the Kansas City area will be banned from the consumer finance business under a proposed settlement with the Federal Trade Commission.
July 7
WASHINGTON — The online payday lender Integrity Advance is being sued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for allegedly deceiving consumers about its loan costs.
The CFPB charged Integrity Advance and its chief executive, James Carnes, for not fully disclosing that charges would continue to accrue after a borrower defaulted on a loan and for automatically debiting borrowers' bank accounts after they stopped authorizing withdrawals.
The CFPB said Wednesday that it filed the suit as an administrative law proceeding, which is a judicial process handled at the CFPB. The amount of redress and any civil money penalty will be determined by an administrative law judge and the CFPB director has final say.
The CFPB claims Delaware-based Integrity Advance offered loans of $100 to $1,000 to consumers who applied by entering their personal information into a lead-generator website. Integrity had certain terms in its loan contracts that allowed a defaulted loan to roll over four times, accruing charges each time, before it applied any payment to the principal balance.
"However, the costs on the disclosures were based on the assumption that the loans would not roll over and would instead be repaid in full by the first payment," the CFPB said. "Integrity Advance never informed consumers of the total costs of their loans if those loans were rolled over, even though the contracts were set up to roll over automatically."
Because of this, some consumers ended up paying for charges that were more than double the amount they first borrowed, amounting to $765 in charges for a $300 loan, the CFPB said.
Integrity Advance was also accused of illegally forcing consumers to agree to repay their loans through pre-authorized Automated Clearing House (ACH) payments. If a consumer canceled the authorization for ACH withdrawals, the lender would then use remotely created checks to continue debiting the account.
"The provision was hidden in the loan agreement, and the company used it to take consumers' funds when consumers believed they did not owe money to Integrity Advance," the CFPB said.
The CFPB sent a so-called "notice of charges" to Integrity Advance on Wednesday, setting in motion the administrative law proceeding. The CFPB will publicly post the notice of charges 10 days after the company is served, pending approval by a hearing officer.
