- Key insight: Citi is one of a handful of banks that are seeking first-mover advantage in crypto custody, tokenized deposits and related services.
- Supporting data: BlackRock's spot bitcoin ETF crossed 800,000 bitcoin under management, worth almost $100 billion, after starting to trade in January 2024.
- Forward look: Citi is building a crypto custody platform for clients that want to invest in digital assets.
"We're innovating a lot in the digital asset space," CEO Jane Fraser told a CNBC reporter in a recent interview.
It's one of a handful of large banks — including
Institutional demand for crypto services is still nascent, but it's quickly growing, according to Grace Broadbent, senior analyst at Emarketer. For example, BlackRock's spot bitcoin ETF crossed 800,000 bitcoin under management in October, worth almost $100 billion, after starting to trade in January 2024.
This makes
Ether custody is "a major advancement for the legacy financial services industry," Broadbent told American Banker. "It signifies closer ties between legacy financial institutions and the digital asset world and helps to further solidify crypto's long-term future in mainstream financial services."
"
Most of
Internal liquidity movements and even settlement tests can add up quickly at a bank of
"That's what makes applying digital assets and tokenized deposits to that part of the business so important: It's a massive amount of money moving around," he said. "It is likely still small relative to
Token Services
One of
Asked why the bank is excited about tokenized deposits, Fraser spoke of clients that do business internationally.
"It comes back to, what does the client need," Fraser said. "A client wants to move money around the world instantaneously, 24/7, 365 days a year, safely and without hassle and complexity. And that's what tokenization does. Tokenization digitizes entire markets. And we've been working on making sure that we can serve that use case from the clients."
Heiko Nix, head of cash management at German technology company Siemens AG, said
Siemens operates in 50 countries and manages more than 300 bank accounts in 40 currencies, Nix said.
"One important milestone was the integration of
For a global bank, tokenized deposits are at the very least "leading edge," Wester said.
"
He also sees demand across certain use cases, such as large multinationals that want 24/7 settlement, reduced intraday liquidity constraints and simpler cross-border flows.
"This market is early, though," Wester said. "The demand is strongest among more sophisticated treasury groups already pushing for real-time infrastructure, not across the entire corporate base. But it's a good start."
"More and more of these entities move dollars around across their multiple bank accounts because liquidity facilitates payments," Chatterjee said. "So anytime they have to make settlements, liquidity is extremely important."
In the past, these clients have manually tracked this movement of money. At the same time, some are working with digital marketplaces or global supply chains with suppliers based in different locations, making their need to manage liquidity on a global basis more dire.
"What we would constantly hear from them is a request to push cut-off times," Chatterjee said. "Can you move it from six o'clock to seven o'clock? Can you move it from seven o'clock to eight o'clock? So the initial use case that we went to market with was to give these global treasurers that had multiple accounts with us in multiple jurisdictions an ability to move liquidity around the
Holiday calendars were also an issue for international companies, he said. The fact that countries observe different holidays causes mismatches on top of time zone issues.
"People were doing things like, when New York would close for the evening, they would take a chunk of liquidity and send it to Asia over the weekend, so that on Monday morning, when Asia opened, they would have enough funds," Chatterjee said. "They would have to estimate how much money they would need Monday morning. If Monday morning Singapore time, which is Sunday night in the U.S., they suddenly realized that they needed more funds, they could initiate a transfer on demand, rather than rely on pre-positioning."
Another use case is securities clearing. When the U.S. securities market moved from T+2 to T+1 settlement,
Mergers and acquisitions are another use case. "You know that the transaction will close and what the amount will be, but as soon as it closes, you're supposed to make all kinds of good faith payments," Chatterjee said. "So we're seeing the use case morph from the original global Treasury model to people that need money on demand. We've had good traction with e-commerce marketplace players that are based in one location, who have suppliers in another location. Their platforms operate on a 24/7 basis, so they've been using these flows."
Recently Chatterjee's team started thinking about what happens when a
"That's added 270 banks that we can move money [to]," Fraser said. "So it's not just within the
One of the biggest differentiators for
"We're using the same access points that they have into us, whether it's through our online banking portal or through our API portal, and we're able to then say, look, you have the same access point, you have the same methods of connecting," Chatterjee said. "You don't have to do anything. We're going to abstract all the complexities of these new technologies and connections at our end, you just get to see the benefits of it."
"Their corporate clients don't want to rebuild treasury plumbing just to test a new settlement rail," he said. "Where I think there are some nuances is in the claim that clients won't have to do anything. That is rarely the case. Treasury clients will still need to update workflows, reporting, reconciliations and controls. But the core idea that customers don't have to worry about no new pipes or integrations is completely credible and a solid message."
Why tokenize?
The reason
"In New York time, our bank allocates a certain amount of liquidity to the New York branch, so transactions through New York can be settled," he said. "Similarly in Hong Kong, our bank treasury allocates a certain amount of U.S. dollar liquidity for transactions in U.S. dollars to settle." This is true for all banks, he said.
"This is the reason why you have cut-off times, because you need to square your books, understand how much liquidity is available, and then, if needed, transfer the liquidity to the next location so they can do that," Chatterjee said. "What tokenization allowed us to do was to get away from a batch infrastructure that operated based on certain cut-off times. Using blockchain technology and ledger technology, we established a 24/7 operating model where you didn't have to physically close down ledger posting and things like that."
The first thing
"So, for example, when a client has an account with us in New York and an account with us in Hong Kong, and he comes and says, move $1 million from New York to Hong Kong, we take a million dollars from their account, and we create a token, and we move the token to the New York branch account," Chatterjee said. "Then the New York branch account, through its blockchain, transfers that token to the Hong Kong branch. When the token arrives in Hong Kong, we burn the token at the branch, so we kill the token, and those funds then get released and get posted or credited to the client's Hong Kong accounts."
This is similar to the way stablecoins are created, registered on a blockchain and moved from one location to the other.
"But tokenization allows us to use the liquidity and the funds the clients have with us," Chatterjee said. "Because these funds are part of the deposit base that clients have with us, it allows us to use the liquidity when the clients need it. We don't need to segregate and hold it saying, what if, so we're not pre-funding any liquidity. We're not creating any coins in advance. So the tokens and the coins only exist when a transfer is happening. You use liquidity on demand only when you need it."
"It's very, very standard, very, very resilient, as we've seen across the ecosystem outside, but we run it on a very private basis," Chatterjee said. Using standardized technology "gives us the optionality of creating many more use cases in the future."
The future: Crypto custody
"Until now, most people have been using proxies — things like ETFs or structured notes," he said. "But there's a growing interest in people saying, 'Can I do it safely and securely through the underlying asset itself, rather than rely on proxy instruments and proxy exposure?' These clients are increasingly looking towards their large partner custodians, like us, to extend those services and provide a one-stop shop."
The basic building blocks for crypto custody are similar to what's needed to provide custody for deposit tokens, he said.
"A lot of the frameworks that our blockchain and our DLT Center of Excellence created are compatible and leverageable for extending it to crypto assets," Chatterjee said. "So the networks that you use internally, the token technology, the wallet technology are exactly the same frameworks that you use now. There are some differences, like the fact that now you're going to interact with an external blockchain."
Crypto custody calls for some new technology elements like digital wallet technology, key management technology, hot and cold storage and connectivity to external blockchains.
"We have been working for a few years on developing those capabilities and integrating them into the rest of our traditional custody systems," Chatterjee said. As it did with Token Services,
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency recently released an interpretive letter confirming that national banks can hold crypto assets and pay network fees related to permissible banking activities.
The interpretive letter gives banks like
Every incremental piece of clarity "reduces friction for banks looking at digital-asset activities," Wester said. "It doesn't mean that offering these services will jump-start demand. It does lower perceived regulatory risk, however, and makes internal conversations between product, risk, compliance, governance and other internal stakeholders easier. Banks won't scale these offerings without clear supervisory comfort, so any interpretive guidance helps."






