Comment: Moral Hazard, or Why We Need Regulation

At my class reunion at Brown a few years ago I was asked to participate in an ethics panel. I started out with a joke, of course.

Processing Content

"Daddy, what are ethics?"

"Well, son, let me give you an example. Let's say someone comes into our store, spends $20, and by accident gives me two $20 bills stuck together.

"The question of ethics is: Should I tell my partner?"

But then I got serious and took the theme "Thou shalt not tempt."

In the National League, pitchers must take their turn at bat. In the American League they are replaced by designated hitters. American League pitchers therefore have more incentive to throw beanballs, because National League pitchers know that today's beaner may well be tomorrow's beanee.

The designated-hitter rule is an example of what economists call moral hazard - an invitation to act selfishly with no fear of risk to yourself.

The best example in the banking business, I told the Brown audience, is the savings and loan debacle. S&L operators knew that if they made risky loans that failed, the nation's taxpayers would pay - as they did, to the tune of $2,500 per man, woman, and child.

I next reminded the audience of the outrageous salaries and bonuses that many corporate leaders have received. How do they get these rewards, completely out of line with what the rest of us make?

Moral hazard; there was no one to stop them. Most boards of directors are made up of full-time employees, friends and business associates of the CEO, and celebrities. All three lack the will to oppose the CEO.

Insiders fear for their jobs and promotion possibilities.

Friends, accountants, other vendors on the board? Why would they cross the person who put them there?

Celebrities? They are happy to take the fees and let their names be used.

Only when there is trouble and board members fear being sued do most boards begin to take their responsibilities seriously. As one chief executive friend of mine told me, "The CEO of an American corporation today is the closest thing to a feudal lord we've ever had."

Who is left to blow the whistle? Unless there is so much fraud that government intervenes, there are only class-action lawyers. And the courts are so tired of petty, unjustified class actions and derivative suits that really valid cases fail.

Legislation is necessary to protect the rest of us from consequence-free actions of a small group, I told the Brown audience. That's too bad, because once government is in it virtually never leaves. But it is hard to think of any other option.

P.S. Visiting Brown, I remembered the chapel speaker who said, "Half of you are Republicans because your fathers are Republicans, and the rest of you are Democrats because your fathers are Republicans." This comment now seems especially pertinent to me, since I went into my father's field after years of bad-mouthing it.

Mr. Nadler, an American Banker contributing editor, is a professor emeritus of finance at Rutgers University Graduate School of Management in Newark, N.J.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Community banking
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER
Load More