Banc One Corp.'s nationwide automated teller machine ambitions hit a  legal wall in Iowa. 
A federal judge has dealt sternly with what he viewed as an illegal  attempt to circumvent the state's electronic funds transfer law. 
  
The skirmish could be replayed as superregional and regional banks enter  new territories through acquisition or branching, raising new questions   about state versus federal jurisdiction over electronic services.   
Judge Ronald E. Longstaff in U.S. District Court for the Southern  District of Iowa denied Banc One's bid for a preliminary injunction that   would have allowed it to operate ATMs in seven Sears, Roebuck and Co.   stores.     
  
Banc One argued that the National Bank Act preempts state law, enabling  it to deploy its Rapid Cash ATMs without having a banking license in Iowa. 
But in the decision issued two weeks ago, the judge said the National  Bank Act "contains no language expressly preempting state ATM law. ... The   dual regulatory system of banking, subjecting national banks to state law   in some instances, indicates Congress did not intend federal law to occupy   the field."       
Columbus, Ohio-based Banc One, which has installed than 6,000 ATMs at  nonbank sites, signed a deal with Sears in 1997 to install up to 800   machines nationwide.   
  
A state lawsuit is pending against Sears, which pulled the plug on the  Rapid Cash machines last year on orders from Iowa banking officials, which   in turn prompted the Banc One petition.   
The banking company "continues to believe our deployment of ATMs in Iowa  is in full compliance with applicable law, and we are confident that our   interpretation of the law ultimately will prevail in court," said Banc One   spokeswoman Patricia Shafer.     
Besides requiring that ATMs be operated by banks fully established in  Iowa, the state law bans advertising at ATMs, requires regulatory approval   for each bank machine, and through routing rules effectively requires that   transactions be processed through Shazam Inc., the shared ATM network based   in Johnston, Iowa.       
The routing rules have discouraged other ATM networks from setting up  shop in the state. 
  
"We cannot go in and compete for business in the state of Iowa, yet they  (Shazam) can come over and establish relationships here," said James   Martin, president and chief executive officer of Tyme, an ATM network based   in Brown Deer, Wis.     
He said the right of outsiders such as Banc One and Tyme to do business  in Iowa "is so clear in my mind I just don't see how a rational person can   justify" the restrictions.   
"Banks want to control their own destiny," said Stephen S. Cole,  president and chief executive officer of Cash Station Inc., a Chicago-based   network with eyes on doing business in the state. "They want to have their   own choice."     
"We are working hard to defend Iowa's laws, which provide for universal  access without surcharges at our ATMs," said Bob Brammer, spokesman for the   state attorney general's office.   
John Sorensen, president of the Iowa Bankers Association, said the  district court decision benefits consumers and prevents putting "our state   banks at a disadvantage if national banks didn't have to comply with" the   state law.