- Key insight: JPMorganChase CEO Jamie Dimon said the bank sees "huge opportunities" to grow, including through its recent acquisition of the Apple card relationship.
- What's at stake: JPMorgan and other banks that have large credit card businesses are suddenly playing defense, after President Trump called for a one-year, 10% cap on interest.
- Forward look: JPMorgan expects to invest about $105 billion on growth initiatives in 2026, up from $96 billion last year.
While
Amid shifts in the regulatory tides and the economic environment, America's largest bank will boost its spending to take advantage of opportunities it sees for technology, fee businesses and consumer relationships.
While the bank reported Tuesday that its
The bank's stock was down 3.8% on Tuesday afternoon.
Here is a look at four major areas of focus from
Playing both offense and defense on credit cards
Last week, the company said it will replace Goldman Sachs as the
"We remain committed to investing our capital to drive future growth, and the Apple Card is one example of patient and thoughtful deployment of our excess capital into attractive opportunities," Dimon said in a prepared statement Tuesday.
Excluding the Apple card deal,
Barnum said on a Tuesday call with analysts that the Apple deal was "economically compelling." He added that Apple is a leader in payments, innovation and user experience.
The transition from Goldman to
"I think the process of getting it done, in the narrow sense, is going to make us better," Barnum said, adding that he expects it to "just generally accelerate and challenge our modernization agenda and the user friendliness of everything that we do in the card business."
The Apple card business equates to about 8% of the company's total credit card loans at the bank.
But the credit card industry in general may be entering a rough patch.
Last week, President Donald Trump
Barnum declined to quantify how a 10% cap could impact the bank, but said that, broadly, the shift would be "very bad for consumers, very bad for the economy," and "it should be obvious that that would also be bad for us."
Because of the competitive nature of the card business, interest rate controls that compress profit margins would mean that "people will lose access to credit, like on a very, very extensive and broad basis, especially the people who need it the most, ironically," Barnum said.
Barnum declined to answer a question about what the nature of
Defending Federal Reserve independence
After friction between the Trump administration and the Federal Reserve entered new ground this week, Dimon reiterated his belief that monetary policy shouldn't be dictated by the president.
The Trump administration has launched a
"While I don't agree with everything the Fed has done, I do have enormous respect for Jay Powell," Dimon told media members Tuesday morning. "Everyone we know believes in Fed independence … and anything that chips away at that is probably not a great idea. And in my view, it will have the reverse consequences — it will raise inflation expectations and probably increase rates over time."
Barnum added that the loss of an independent Fed would raise concerns about damage to American economic prospects and global economic stability.
"The broad market narrative here is that loss of Fed independence tends to lead to steeper yield curves and other damage to ongoing economic dynamism," Barnum said. "As a company, of course, we manage our yield curve risk very carefully, and so I wouldn't think that that would be the first thing we would worry about."
Dimon has previously defended Powell, calling
Justifying expense growth
Bankers, advisors and branch investments will drive about $3 billion, or one-third, of the increase in expenses, which Barnum said reflects long-term confidence in the company.
Some expenses, which come from volume and revenue-related activities, are what the bank calls "good expenses," Barnum said. Some of the uptick in spending reflects
"We're a little bit cautious about market appreciation drivers given where we're launching from, and given the type of year that it's been this year," Barnum said. "It's a little bit of a balanced story, I would say, in terms of fee outlook for 2026. Not for any particularly negative reason, but just because 2025 was so exceptionally strong."
Dimon declined to specify the level of returns the bank anticipates from each of its investments, but said the spending "would be justified by the results."
"We see huge opportunities," Dimon said. "We're opening rural branches. … We're opening more branches in foreign countries. We're building better payment systems. We're adding better personalization in consumer banking, credit card. We're adding AI across the company."
Shedding more light on loans to nonbank financial institutions
In 2025,
Using the bank's definition implies that its NBFI portfolio is roughly half the size that it measures when it uses the regulatory definition. The bank has more than $332 billion of loans to nonbank entities, it said, but the company's own definition leaves it with only about $160 billion.
By any definition, that loan book has scaled significantly in recent years. Per the bank's adjustment, its NBFI loans have more than tripled since 2018.
"As we've been talking about for the last couple of years, there's no reason that we can't compete head-to-head in that space," Barnum said.
Dimon and Barnum both pointed to certain capital requirements and leveraged lending rules that have driven the sector's growth.
Regulators have made moves in recent months to roll back some of those rules, which some analysts have said may dampen some NBFI loan growth in 2026.
Since 2018,
Barnum said Tuesday that "given the structural protections" of NBFI loans, the bank would expect any losses to be the result of either fraud or a deep recession that would cause bigger problems with direct lending.
Dimon said on the call with analysts that the bank's NBFI business is an arbitrage, since those loans can be better for banks' regulatory capital positions than making loans directly.
Barnum added that the company also aims to provide what its customers want.
"That's why we really leaned into this whole product-agnostic strategy that we talk about," Barnum said. "And at the same time, in the cases where we don't wind up being a lender, yes, sometimes we're competing with these folks. Sometimes they're our clients. Sometimes they're both."






