WASHINGTON -- Senators examining the nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court expressed concerns yesterday about the nominee's respect for judicial precedent and his views on a legal theory known as natural law.

But legal scholars said the high court already has moved away from a strict adherence to its precedents, opening the door for state and local governments to recover some power lost to the federal government in previous cases.

Limited Time Offer

Save $400 off your subscription. Special offer ends April 30, 2017.

14-Day Free Trial

No credit card required. Complete access to articles, breaking news and industry data.