Exclusive Research

It's not about crypto, it's about payment cadence: How faster pay wins consumer loyalty

Key insight: Consumers prioritize payment speed and real-time liquidity over blockchain mechanics, showing strong demand for instant payouts despite widespread misunderstanding and low ownership of digital assets.
What's at stake: Institutions that overcomplicate payments with crypto jargon risk compliance pitfalls and customer alienation, while those that fail to accelerate payout speeds risk losing market share to tech-forward competitors.
Forward look: Payment leaders should deploy a dual-rail strategy that uses existing real-time payment rails to deliver instant wage access today while leveraging on-chain technology as invisible back-end infrastructure for long-term settlement efficiency.

Processing Content

Consumers largely misunderstand stablecoins and view on-chain products as speculative investments rather than payment tools, but they desperately want banks to deliver what on-chain tech enables: faster, cheaper, and more frequent payouts. 

Payment leaders can win by maximizing existing faster processing options to meet consumer expectations, while leveraging on-chain technology as invisible back-end infrastructure for the future. The playbook isn't marketing crypto jargon, but rather demonstrating how digital assets produce tangible results. That means delivering instant payouts today via established instant payment rails, while developing on-chain infrastructure to maximize long-term settlement efficiency. Hide the plumbing, and sell the speed.

American Banker data revealed five key consumer wants:

  • Consumers want immediate conversion of digital payouts into standard fiat currency upon receipt to eliminate complexity and volatility. 
  • Workers are in favor of getting paid as soon as hours are worked, or when they choose, to align with bills and other payments. 
  • Users want real-time wage features embedded directly inside their existing commercial bank app rather than managing third-party wallets. 
  • Consumers prioritize liquidity and speed—getting their money sooner and more frequently—over technological novelty. 
  • Customers want payments that "work like cash" with zero learning curve, prioritizing speed, affordability, and certainty over blockchain mechanics.

Digital assets may still be viewed as speculative, but the demand for instant payroll is real. Winning customer loyalty is more about accelerating settlement versus selling new tech, be it on-chain or infrastructure modernization upgrades.
In May and June, American Banker's Market Intelligence team surveyed 1,000 U.S. consumers to study how they use, view, and understand digital currencies, specifically cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. The data revealed that digital assets are still viewed as niche investment vehicles rather than day-to-day payment rails, but certain factors would drive consumers to utilize digital currencies more.

This is the second installment of our three-part series examines the niche nature of digital currency and what could drive broader consumer adoption. It follows our first report on P2P friction. Next week, the third and final report will cover cross-border payments, which reveals a surprising consumer preference for P2P apps over traditional remittance specialists

Consumers are more interested in speed than the tech

While the majority of consumers hold no cryptocurrency or stablecoins (74%), interest in digital currencies spikes when they are pitched as a tool for instant, frictionless payroll. 

When asked if they would receive wages in a digital currency that "works like cash and can be spent, saved, or transferred instantly," 60% of employed respondents expressed interest, including 27% who stated they were "very interested."

However, this interest has more to do with access to funds than genuine interest in digital currencies. Consumers do not necessarily care about the underlying blockchain architecture; they care about speed, liquidity, and integration with their existing financial lives. When evaluating features that would increase their willingness to accept digital wages, traditional stablecoin selling points take a backseat to speed and convenience:

  1. Instant Conversion to USD (27%): The ability to automatically swap digital tokens into fiat currency upon receipt.
  2. Instant Earned Wage Access (25%): Eliminating the standard two-week pay cycle or clearing delays.
  3. Primary Bank Account Integration (23%): Managing digital wages directly inside their existing commercial bank app.

Interest in digital payroll is driven by instant wage access and immediate bank conversion. By contrast, the defining hallmark of a stablecoin, that its value is pegged to $1, ranked eighth out of ten features tested, convincing only 14% of employees and 26% of self-described "very familiar" respondents.

This means that banks can deliver instant earned wage access using existing infrastructure by connecting to employer payroll software via open-banking APIs and instantly disbursing accrued wages over real-time payment rails like RTP and FedNow. Or, banks can address this friction by integrating digital currency payroll rails into their existing mobile apps to enable instant wage settlements for workers. They can also enable themselves as the on and off ramps.

Existing consumer behaviors and demographics strongly predict openness to digital payroll. Individuals who already hold crypto are more likely to be interested in digital asset wages, with 83%, compared to 46% of non-holders who would be interested in digital asset wages. Eighty-seven percent of respondents who frequently send money across borders would be interested, versus 47% of non-senders. Additionally, of those who reported themselves to feel "very familiar" with stablecoins, 93% would be interested in digital asset wages, compared to those who were unfamiliar with stablecoins, with 41% being interested in digital asset wages.

Consumers misunderstand how stablecoins function

A critical challenge for financial institutions looking to deploy retail on-chain solutions is widespread consumer confusion, even among those who claim to understand the technology.

Basic consumer literacy around stablecoins remains minimal: 55% of consumers report being "not at all familiar" with stablecoins. The familiarity with stablecoins brings up an important facet of digital assets in the world of payments. 

In a scenario-based comprehension test showing respondents a $100 USDC transfer, only 45% avoided every false statement, and just 1% chose all three true statements without a false one. 23% of all consumers mistakenly believe stablecoins are FDIC-insured. Meanwhile, 27% held a mix of true and false beliefs, and 28% held entirely false assumptions.

The most glaring risk for banks and issuers is the systemic misunderstanding of regulatory protections:

  • 23% of consumers believe $100 in stablecoins is FDIC-insured like a standard bank deposit.
  • 32% assume stablecoins can be spent anywhere standard dollars are accepted.
  • 18% believe stablecoin transactions are entirely untraceable.

Surprisingly, self-described familiarity does not eliminate these misconceptions, but rather amplifies them. As consumer familiarity moves from "not at all familiar" to "very familiar," the share of respondents avoiding false beliefs actually drops from 48% to 35%, while the share holding mixed (accurate and inaccurate) beliefs surges from 22% to 46%. Higher confidence appears to introduce additional false assumptions rather than displacing existing errors.

Low ownership, but some consumers are more primed than others

Today, consumer engagement with on-chain assets remains speculative. Results found that there is a low baseline of ownership, with approximately three quarters of U.S. consumers holding no digital currencies. Of those who do own digital currencies, 83% hold Bitcoin, 28% hold Ethereum, and 20% hold stablecoins.

Among the respondents who do hold digital assets, 40% cite investment as their motivation, followed by tech curiosity (35%). Only 24% say they hold crypto to pay for things. It is notable that almost a quarter of respondents report holding digital assets to actually pay for things. Given that most businesses across the country do not accept digital assets as payments, this may be done through online payments or enabled through payment service providers that allow businesses to accept digital currencies.

Segments of the consumer population are more primed than others to adopt and use digital currencies. Younger workers express more enthusiasm for digital wage options, led by Gen Z at 79% combined interest (37% "very interested" and 42% "somewhat interested") and Millennials at 65% (30% "very" and 35% "somewhat"). In contrast, older generations exhibit marked skepticism: Gen X leans negative with 48% interested compared to 53% disinterested, while Boomers overall reject the idea, with 82% reporting disinterest and 49% declaring they are "not at all interested". This enthusiasm among younger demographics aligns with their high adoption of peer-to-peer payment apps, digital wallets, and decentralized finance, where instant settlement and borderless flexibility match more of their day-to-day transaction habits.

However, the strong disinterest among older cohorts highlights major hurdles for employer adoption, including lingering concerns over asset volatility, cybersecurity, regulatory clarity, and deep-seated trust in legacy banking infrastructure.

Interest in digital currency wages remains remarkably consistent across household income brackets, maintaining majority support in every tier; however, at both ends of the economic spectrum, there is a slight increase in interest. Top earners making $100K+ exhibit the strongest enthusiasm, with 63% combined interest and a survey-high 35% reporting they are "very interested." At the same time, lower-income households demonstrate nearly identical demand, with 61% of those earning under $25K and 62% of those making $25–49K open to digital wage options. The $75–99K bracket reflects slightly more caution, dipping to a 55% majority interest while logging the highest resistance at 30% "not at all interested."

It suggest potentially two distinct adoption drivers: lower-earning workers are likely attracted by practical utility—such as avoiding traditional bank delays, reducing remittance, and gaining instant access to earned funds—while higher earners are more likely motivated by crypto investment opportunities, portfolio diversification, and early tech adoption. Unlike the sharp drop-off seen across older age groups, the broad baseline demand across income tiers highlights that digital payroll benefits have cross-class appeal, offering companies a versatile tool for both hourly worker financial wellness and executive talent recruitment.

Navigating Segmented Consumer Readiness

Consumer loyalty is not won by marketing blockchain technology, but by accelerating money frequency and cadence. While most consumers remain uninvolved with digital assets and largely misunderstand stablecoin mechanics, their demand for real-time liquidity and frictionless payroll is immediate and growing. Attempting to sell customers on crypto jargon only introduces confusion, misaligned expectations, and compliance risk. 

Furthermore, consumer readiness is far from uniform. While primed segments, such as current crypto holders, frequent cross-border remitters, and tech-familiar workers, are more eager to adopt digital asset rails, many mainstream consumers remain entirely content with how their payments function today. Forcing a sudden shift to digital currencies risks alienating satisfied traditionalists, while failing to modernize leaves banks vulnerable to losing market share to tech-forward payment providers. This divergence is precisely why a dual-rail strategy is essential: it allows financial institutions to meet traditional customers where they are via familiar real-time rails, while routing primed users onto next-generation infrastructure, delivering modern payment speed without disrupting the status quo. 

Methodology: The On-Chain Consumer Survey 2026 was fielded by American Banker's Market Intelligence team among 1,000 U.S. consumers in May-June 2026. 
Quota design: The sample is balanced cellwise to the U.S. census by gender and age, and to the overall white non-Hispanic share. Composition within the non-white/Hispanic group was not quota-controlled and departs from census: Black respondents are over-represented and Hispanic respondents under-represented. Figures are unweighted. Race, ethnicity and region results describe this sample and should not be read as national estimates.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Market Intelligence Payments Cryptocurrency Stablecoin Digital banking Industry Research
MORE FROM AMERICAN BANKER
Load More