Quantcast
AUG 22, 2011 5:03pm ET

Web Seminars

The End of the Magstripe?
The State of EMV Smartcards in the U.S.
Available On Demand
10 Ways to Achieve Better IT Credibility…and Save Money | A Financial Services Case Study
Available On Demand
Executing Effective Validations in 2011 & Beyond
Available On Demand

Appraisal Management Companies Create More Problems Than They Solve

Print
Reprints
Email

When the final chapter on this housing crisis is written, I hope that I am still around to see those who were responsible for its cause and the feeble attempts to fix it held responsible.

One of the worst fixes is the Home Valuation Code of Conduct. Enacted in 2009, HVCC was spearheaded by then New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. His objective was to rein in appraisal abuses by the lenders sending loans to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

A noble goal, but by the time this so-called fix went into action many of the worst offenders were either shuttered or had lined up for a bailout. For those of us interested in the history of the housing crisis, let me remind you of Cuomo's repeated calls, during his tenure as HUD secretary, to prod Fannie and Freddie into buying ever more loans made to risky borrowers for the sole purpose of expanding homeownership.

The HVCC drove business to appraisal management companies, which were designed to be independent third parties, uninfluenced by the mortgage lenders. Mortgage lenders now require originators to place their appraisal orders with an AMC, who then contracts with an appraiser to perform the work on behalf of the borrower.

Today many of these AMCs are directly or partially owned by mortgage wholesalers and large national banks. They hide behind the firewall of an independent company, but if they own that company, either in whole or a piece, who are they kidding?

Imagine needing a medical doctor and having to go through an intermediary who will decide which doctor you may visit, and that doctor is chosen primarily on his fee charged, not expertise.

Consumers are paying more for residential appraisals. The appraisers who are doing the work are receiving a fraction of what they once earned. Unfortunately this structure has chased away many good appraisers who are unwilling to do more work for much less money.

I currently have a client who paid $500 for a single-family residential appraisal. Prior to HVCC this report would have cost my client $350. Then they were forced by the lender who also owns the AMC, to spend an additional $240 on a field review of that very report, done by an appraiser also chosen by the same AMC. The field review confirmed the exact dollar value of the first report.

Early on in my mortgage banking career, I felt the need to fully understand what went into a residential appraisal in order to be able to explain a report intelligently to my clients. I enrolled in 75 hours of education with the Appraisal Institute. After completing the curriculum, I earned the necessary education requirements to become an appraisal trainee. The next step would be to then apprentice for 2,000 hours under a licensed appraiser and complete more classroom education.

I came to appreciate the unique task the residential real estate appraisers perform. They are charged with giving an opinion of value on a piece of property at a specific date. This opinion is based in part on conditions within the subject property and comparable sales in the immediate neighborhood. They must comply with standards set forth by the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. The value derived will be used in my world to secure a loan. They are the umpires of the real estate world. There is no crystal ball.

As an independent licensed mortgage lender I developed a thick Rolodex of appraisers with expertise in specific communities over the past 14 years. It is now worthless. I am no longer able to directly order an appraisal or even speak to an appraiser on behalf of my client.

Since the HVCC was enacted I have seen a steady decline in the quality of residential appraisal reports. I have witnessed appraisers who are traveling from out-of-state and without any basic knowledge of the subject community. Understanding the area in which you have accepted an assignment is a basic rule of appraising.

Appraisers are under pressure from their new bosses at the AMCs. An extremely knowledgeable appraiser confided in me that he is forced to produce more comparables within a specific time period, judge the future value of a home in a declining market and most recently provide aerial photographs for the subject property.

The AMC is requiring him to perform this miracle in a shorter period of time and for less money. Today a residential report may contain as many as 9 comparable properties to support the value. That means researching and inspecting 9 different properties in addition to the subject. He further explained that some of the appraisal requests from the lenders underwriting the loan conflict with USPAP.

Keep in mind that appraisers are working for a smaller fee then they received prior to HVCC, but the same overhead. In the past if a lender needed more comparables or further work, the appraiser could bill the client. Not so with the AMC. They are working for a flat fee. As a result they search for the path of least resistance with a report so the lender does not ask any questions, which would require more work.

Whether working with an independent lender or large retail bank, consumers need a quality appraisal for their home. It is time to dismantle the HVCC and let the real estate appraisers make the proper calls on value without any influence other then their professional standards.

Richard Booth is a certified mortgage banker with America’s First Funding Group LLC, a residential and commercial lender in Neptune, N.J.

Comments (14)
The effects of the HVCC are as you describe, but it has been replaced with provisions of Dodd-Frank and the Appraiser Independence Guidelines adopted by Fannie and Freddie. Unfortunately, for consumers, real estate brokers, mortgage loan originators and appraisers, the detrimental effects linger.
Posted by Francois G | Tuesday, August 23 2011 at 10:26AM ET
My VMC offers appraisal management to all clients and I disagree with you regarding fees increasing and appraisers making less. Usual and customary fees being what it is...our appraisers tell us what they charge...yes we have to work within fee framework as directed by the client...we also take into our panel a lenders appraisers, directing the lenders assignments to those appraisers and thus complying with the new rules...my company is privately owned and operated...no pressures from silent partners/lenders...totally independent and unbiased...I agree with the 1st comment that HVCC has been replaced with certain provisions of Dodd-Frank and the AIG adopted by Freddie and Fannie...however Francois G. fails to comment on Dodd Frank being in a holding pattern with implementation being pushed back to some unknown date...
Posted by 32highboy | Tuesday, August 23 2011 at 3:19PM ET
Richard - terrific post and spot-on. Given the fragile nature of banks, it's perhaps one of the biggest disconnects from reality in mortgage lending to embed a weaker reliability into the valuation of collateral. While HVCC has sunset, it is embedded into bank and regulatory policy. I had high hopes that appraisal standards (not the list of do's and don'ts) would improve after what the economy went through in 2008. Apparently not.
Posted by Jonathan Miller | Tuesday, August 23 2011 at 4:49PM ET
Emil D's comment that fees are being told to AMCs so they know what to charge is wildly misleading and self-serving. The kind of appraiser they seek is well aware of the AMC industry fee structure and makes a living off of playing by the AMC rules to get the volume. Remember that the only hard and fast requirement seems to be that you are licensed in the state and agree to the fee. Its no wonder people outside the appraisal process are confused about what all the fuss is about.
Posted by Jonathan Miller | Tuesday, August 23 2011 at 4:58PM ET
Mr Booth:

Thanks for the concise description of the damage being done to the appraisal industry by heavy lender reliance on AMCs. With almost 15 years of appraisal experience, I can tell you that the damage is considerable and may be unrecoverable if the current paradigm is allowed to linger just a few more years. Beyond significantly increasing the transaction costs to the consumer - shifting lenders' former back-room operating costs onto consumers - AMCs are actively encouraging Appraisers to gloss over or omit any information that does not fit into their silly check-lists and delaying the process by at least several days in every case; several weeks in others.

Before AMCs were given 85% of the market, call-backs for any form of addenda or additional analysis were rare - perhaps one of every 20 reports. Now, with a ever-growing list of "requirements" that have nothing at all to do with the home's value, most Appraisers get at least one addendum demand for every three or four reports. Of the 60 or so addendum demands I have fielded so far this year, not one could have even possibly had anything at all to do with the home's value; the crux of our purpose. The vast majority were demands for re-statement, in small words, of something already discussed in detail within the report.

Posted by Fred H | Tuesday, August 23 2011 at 6:07PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

About BankThink

BankThink is a blog about ideas, trends, and other developments in financial services. Click here for editorial submission guidelines.

Email Newsletters

Get the Daily Briefing and the Morning Update when you sign up for a free trial.

Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.