Quantcast
BANKTHINK

'Frontline' Learns Firsthand Why Wall Street Is 'Untouchable'

JAN 22, 2013 3:30pm ET
Print
Email
Reprints
(19) Comments

Why haven't any senior executives gone to jail? This is such a familiar question by now that anyone asking it for the first time needs to be more specific. Name names, and the laws allegedly broken.

"The Untouchables" stops short of doing so. It paints an unflattering portrait of former Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo, who presided over a blithe "Fund 'Em" strategy for mortgage lending. It leaves the viewer thinking Rubin might have responded to that "URGENT" email with slightly more alacrity and in so doing could have helped Citigroup avoid an eventual $45 billion in government bailouts. We see Congressional testimony from Blankfein and Dimon. But it's left to the audience to infer that some of these executives should be on the government's short list for prosecutions – and which bankers, under which statutes? (The show also ignores some of the more recent industry scandals, from Libor-rigging and money-laundering violations at several big banks to the London Whale trading losses at JPMorgan. Once again, the U.S. government has yet to hold any senior bank executives personally responsible for those problems.)

Lanny Breuer, assistant attorney general of the Justice Department's criminal division and "Frontline's" designated villain for the government's inaction, was "overly fearful" of losing any criminal cases, the program says, citing two former department prosecutors (neither identified by name).

Breuer tells Smith that when the government doesn't have enough evidence to bring a case, "we have … an ethical obligation not to bring those cases.  But it's not for lack of trying."

Ultimately, while "The Untouchables" ably catalogues plenty of bad behavior, it sets itself up for the nearly impossible task of proving on television what the government, with its awesome powers and vast resources has been unable (or afraid to try) to prove in court: That specific individuals committed specific crimes.

Why haven't any bankers been criminally prosecuted for the financial crisis? Every time that question is asked, it seems to become more and more unanswerable.

Maria Aspan is the National Editor at American Banker. The views expressed are her own.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION

(19) Comments

SEE MORE IN

RELATED TAGS

How to Bank the Underbanked: In Pictures

Bankers, nonprofit executives and others recently gathered to discuss how best to provide financial services to low-income and other underserved customers. Here is some of their advice about how to charge for prepaid cards and other products, how to create new ones and how to cope with increased regulatory scrutiny. (Image: Shutterstock)

Comments (19)
There are two reasons we don't name names. First, we don't know many of the names because we do not have access to them. Second, we have libel laws. You can't call people criminals without exposing yourself to vicious and destructive litigation. The second problem is exacerbated by the repeated statements from the Obama Administration that there was recklessness or negligence, but no intentional fraud.
Posted by masaccio | Tuesday, January 22 2013 at 3:46PM ET
History repeats itself. When government holds bankers to task, like Charles Keating in the 1980s tax payer bailout/savings and loan scandal, there will always be some politicos trying to prevent regulators from acting in the public's interest, instead of the criminals (see Keating Five's John McCain). I recall that Angelo Mozillo had lots of friends too.
Posted by andkel | Tuesday, January 22 2013 at 4:03PM ET
The hard thing to understand is how a company like Countrywide could pump so many bad assets into the securitization markets without violating the securities laws. A recent report on 60 Minutes said a third of the outstanding loans made by Countrywide were in default or foreclosure. That is an astonishing number if it is true. And, if it is true, I cannot understand how the risks in those loans could have been adequately disclosed to investors or how rating agencies could rate them investment grade. That is where the system broke down causing the Great Recession and where policy makers should be paying the most attention. If that doesn't violate the securities laws the laws need to be fixed.
Posted by gsutton | Tuesday, January 22 2013 at 4:46PM ET
Last night's edition of Frontline showed that Wall Street firms and their staff are "Untouchable." Absolutely shocking to see the case against the banks that precipitated the Financial Crisis laid out so thoroughly, along with the proactive ineptitude of the government in holding them accountable. Clearly a case of the government working against the best interests of its citizens. Stark contrast to a government that sent over 1,000 bankers to jail for their roles in the S&L Crisis.
Posted by jim_wells | Wednesday, January 23 2013 at 7:08AM ET
Having watched the program last night, one explanation for the lack of prosecutions is obvious: the decicison makers at the DOJ are cautious to the point of cowardice. Heads should roll not just among the banksters, but at the Justice Dept. To the extent still possible new and more aggressive blood should be brought in to go after prosecutions. Elliot Spitzer's not doing much, why not give somebody of his proven skills a shot?
Posted by j.doe | Wednesday, January 23 2013 at 10:33AM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

This feature displays payments industry news and analysis from American Banker sibling brand PaymentsSource. Registration is required; for more information contact customer service.

TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.